Justice Anthony Kennedy Is Retiring

President Donald Trump will have a chance to shape the Supreme Court for decades to come.

Olivier Douliery/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Justice Anthony Kennedy is retiring after serving 30 years on the Supreme Court. The announcement gives President Donald Trump the opportunity to nominate the second Supreme Court justice of his presidency and sets up an epic political fight over Kennedyā€™s replacement. Republicans are likely to push for a quick confirmation hearing before November’s midterm elections, when there is a possibility of Democrats regaining control of the Senate.

Kennedy wrote a letter to Trump on Wednesday announcing his intention to retire effective July 31.

Appointed in 1988 by President Ronald Reagan, Kennedy has been the courtā€™s least ideological conservative for a number of years, voting with the liberal justices in 5-4 decisions more often than any other conservative justice. His role as a swing voter has made him the courtā€™s most powerful justice, with Supreme Court advocates tailoring oral arguments specifically to try to win his favor.

His votes with liberals on everything from same-sex marriage to abortion to banning the execution of intellectually disabled defendants have occasionally prompted conservatives to attack him as a sellout. As far back as 2005, then-House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), a conservative, publicly denounced Kennedy as an activist justice whose opinions reflected his isolation from ordinary Americans.  ā€œWeā€™ve got Justice Kennedy writing decisions based upon international law, not the Constitution of the United States? Thatā€™s just outrageous,ā€ DeLay told Fox News Radio. ā€œAnd not only that, but he said in session that he does his own research on the internet? That is just incredibly outrageous.ā€

Conservatives have been urging Kennedy to get out of the way so that Trump can appoint his replacement, preferably before the midterm elections in November. They would like someone more reliably conservative than Kennedy, in the mold of Justice Neil Gorsuch, a former Kennedy clerk whom Trump nominated to the court 11 days into his presidency. In a not-so-subtle message to Kennedy, the president’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, even made a trip to the Supreme Court with her daughter and observed oral arguments as Kennedyā€™s guest.

Liberals, meanwhile, have been channeling anguished pleas to the California-born justice to hang on to protect his legacy. Most notably, the New York Times editorial board in April published a lengthy letter to Kennedy begging, ā€œPlease donā€™t go.ā€ The Times noted that he was an ā€œequal-opportunity disappointerā€ā€”he joined the conservative majority in landmark cases such as Citizens United, the controversial 2010 decision that opened the door to unlimited corporate contributions to political campaigns. Nonetheless, the Times implored Kennedy to think about his legacy on a few important cases where he pushed the court in the direction of civil liberties, abortion rights, and protections for LGBT peopleā€”a record that culminated in the historic Obergefell decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide in 2015.

Kennedyā€™s decision to retire gives Trump the opportunity to move the court farther to the right. Heā€™s been angling for the opportunity for many months, randomly releasing an updated ā€œshort listā€ of 25 potential nominees in November. Among the leading contenders to replace Kennedy is Brett Kavanaugh, a former Kennedy clerk and judge on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, a court that has been the stepping stone for three sitting Supreme Court justices. Appointed by President George W. Bush, Kavanaugh earned his spot on the DC Circuit after working for Ken Starr investigating President Bill Clintonā€™s relationship with intern Monica Lewinsky and preparing an impeachment case against Clinton. At 53, Kavanaugh is, like Gorsuch, young enough to influence the court for decades to come.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate