Parkland Families Push to End School Violence With New Advocacy Group

Stand With Parkland will push for universal background checks.

Ryan Petty, center, reads a prepared statement surrounded by other parents of the victims of Stoneman Douglas shooting on March 5, 2018.Jose A. Iglesias/Miami Herald via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Families who lost children and spouses in the February 14 school shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, announced Thursday the creation a new advocacy organization that will seek to address school violence and prevent gun-related massacres.

The group, called Stand With Parkland, promotes three approaches to keep schools safe: school security measures to harden schools’ perimeters; mental health support programs to help identify and treat young people who may pose a risk to themselves or others; and gun control measures such as universal background checks for weapons buyers, which the group refers to as “responsible firearms ownership.” Its goal is to help pass bipartisan legislation at the state and federal level that will stop future school shootings.

This announcement is just the latest initiative by the families of Parkland victims to address the problems that led to their loved ones’ deaths. Much like those other collective efforts, this one is intended to appeal to politicians on both sides of the aisle. While many of the Parkland students and thousands of their “March for Our Lives” supporters have placed their emphasis on gun control laws that draw ire from right, Stand with Parkland has broadened its scope to include mental health and school safety ideas backed by Democrats and Republicans alike in the hopes of attracting bipartisan support. According to Rolling Stone, the group has been working with a DC-based consultant who also advises a centrist Blue Dog Democrats.

It’s an approach these families have been using since shortly after the February shooting. Last month, I wrote about the ways Ryan Petty, who lost his daughter Alaina in the shooting, and Fred Guttenberg, whose daughter Jaime was killed, have worked together, despite their differing views on the gun issue: Petty sees much of the gun debate as a polarizing non-starter, while Guttenberg has become an outspoken gun control advocated. The two have largely set those differences aside and have joined with other Parkland families to push school safety legislation at the state and federal level. Both Petty and Guttenberg are involved in the new Stand With Parkland group, though Guttenberg says that Tony Montalto, who lost his 14-year-old daughter Gina in the shooting, has taken the lead in organizing.

As I explained in my story about Petty and Guttenberg:

[W]here Guttenberg and Petty agree, they work together. They, along with 11 other Parkland families, supported the STOP School Violence Act, a bipartisan bill that provides federal funds to strengthen school security infrastructure and train students and staff how to identify safety threats. The two fathers also threw their support behind the package of reforms Florida lawmakers passed in the wake of the tragedy. That legislation included a new three-day waiting period for all gun purchases, an increase in the minimum age for purchasing rifles and shotguns to 21, a red-flag law, and a ban on bump stocks, the gun accessory used in last year’s Las Vegas massacre that makes semi-automatic weapons behave like machine guns.

Those modest gun control measures fell short of what Guttenberg wanted—he called it “minimally acceptable” and “the best that could happen in Florida.” But it went far beyond anything else the state’s politicians have done recently to restrict gun sales, and it represented a serious defeat for the NRA. Despite his distaste for the gun debate, Petty backed these restrictions, noting that the age provision might have prevented the Parkland shooter from buying a gun. And he’s come to the defense of the GOP legislators who, after backing the bill, received harsh reactions from the NRA. “This legislation was based on the very best ideas for protecting our schools,” he says. “Its core gun control provision gives law enforcement another tool to keep firearms out of the hands of those that pose an imminent risk to themselves or others.”

The group has not yet announced its immediate next steps, but much like their #NeverAgain teen counterparts, it will aim to channel the renewed energy of the gun control movement into measurable political action.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate