A Democratic Congressman Wants to Run for New York AG. It Could Make Winning the House Back Even Harder.

Sean Patrick Maloney’s plan to run in two races could cause problems for Democrats.

Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom via ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Democrats got some good news on Tuesday in California, where they appear to have averted a much-hyped disaster and secured spots on the ballot in four Republican-held congressional districts. But in New York—the California of the East!—their outlook got a little bit more clouded. That’s because Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, a third term Democrat in a district won by President Donald Trump, announced that he would run to replace former Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who resigned last month following allegations of sexual abuse.

Maloney, the first openly gay congressman in New York state, is a rising star in Democratic politics who was responsible for drafting the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s 2016 autopsy report and even entertained running the DCCC himself. By entering the AG race, he joined a field that includes Letitia James, the New York City public advocate, and Zephyr Teachout, a Fordham law professor and lefty favorite who was the party’s 2016 nominee in a congressional district that neighbors the one Maloney represents.

But Maloney isn’t dropping his House re-election campaign to run for the attorney general job, and that’s where things get complicated. New York has one of the most convoluted election systems in the country, part of which entails holding primaries for federal and state offices on separate days. The attorney general primary is in September and the congressional primary is in June.

Maloney intends to run in both races for now, but has said he’ll give up the congressional nomination if he wins the attorney general primary. Except it’s not clear that he can actually do that. New York law bars candidates from running for two seats at the same time—the fact that the primaries are on different dates, he believes, is a loophole. But a Democratic House colleague, Rep. Kathleen Rice, specifically cited “the current state law prohibiting candidates from seeking two offices simultaneously” in explaining last month why she wouldn’t run for AG.

Maloney has the time (and the lawyers) to work that out, and the filing deadline for the statewide races isn’t for another month. But what happens if he wins both primaries? That’s where things get dicier for Democrats, who may not have much margin for error in their quest to take back the House.

Although 2018 is expected to be a good year for House Democrats, Maloney’s district has been extremely competitive in two of the previous three campaigns. He unseated Republican Rep. Nan Hayworth in 2012 by less than four points, then won a rematch two years later by 3,333 votes. Maloney won more comfortably in 2016, but the district swung sharply to the right—his was one of 18 districts Obama carried twice that went for Trump. In February, Maloney was named to the National Republican Congressional Committee’s target list. With Maloney in the race, the Cook Political Report rated the seat as solidly Democratic. If he were to drop out in September, a Democratic replacement would only have seven weeks to build a winning campaign in a swing district, with neither the fundraising or name recognition of the incumbent.

Maloney told Roll Call on Wednesday that everything will be okay. “I’ve been talking to Democratic leadership and what I can tell you is we’ll have a plan in place to keep the seat if I win the attorney general nomination,” he said. So far, any plan remains secret, and the path for Democrats to hold onto that seat might get a lot more challenging than it appeared last month.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate