The Trump Administration Still Doesn’t Have a Coherent Plan to Reunite the Families It Separated

“The isolation and lack of information is just devastating.”

Children protest the Trump administration's family separation policy in New York.G. Ronald Lopez/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Friday morning, for the first time in nearly a month, there were no parents at the McAllen, Texas, courthouse who had been separated from their children. Standing outside the court, EfrĆ©n Olivares, the director of the Texas Civil Rights Projectā€™s racial and economic justice program, told reporters that his organization had interviewed more than 380 separated parents over the past month. This was the first time since at least May 24 that no parents were being prosecuted in McAllen after being split from their children.

But the suffering caused by President Donald Trumpā€™s family separation policy is far from over. Olivares said there are more than 1,000 children who are still separated from their parents. Some parents don’t even know where their children are. More than 2,300 children were separated from 2,206 parents between May 5 and June 9, according to government officials. 

The administration has not articulated any clear policy or plan for reuniting families. Child and immigrant advocates, lawyers, and federal public defenders say the process for connecting separated family members remains convoluted and opaque. It can take weeks, if not months, for parents to locate their children and connect with them on the phone.

Children have been taken to shelters all over the country while their parents remain far away in detention. And some parents may have been deported without their children; the New York Times reported on Sunday that a mother was deported to Guatemala without her son.

On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order that calls for ending family separation and instead detaining families together indefinitely. (A court ruling currently bars the government from keeping children detained for more than about 20 days.) The next day, he said he was directing government agencies to reunite the families that his zero-tolerance policy separated. But there is not much evidence that is happening yet.

The Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement that it is ā€œawaiting further guidance on the implementation of the executive order.ā€ US Immigration and Customs Enforcement told reporters earlier this week that its usual policy is to wait until families are close to being deported before reuniting them. ICE did not respond to requests for comment about whether its reunification policy has changed since the executive order was issued.

Some families have been reunited, but most have not. The Texas Civil Rights Project has not been able to confirm that any of the more than 380 parents it worked with have joined their children.

The Trump administration is currently fighting a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union that would require the Department of Homeland Security to reunite families, either by releasing them or by holding them in family detention facilities. A Justice Department lawyer told a federal judge in the case in early May that there is not a process for reuniting families after theyā€™re separated. Lee Gelernt, the deputy director of the ACLU Immigrantsā€™ Rights Project, tells Mother Jones that the government didnā€™t provide a justification for keeping families apart. ā€œI don’t think they have a reason not to do it, other thanā€”the truth is that they’re trying to use separation as a deterrent,ā€ Gelernt says.

Erik Hanshew, a federal public defender in El Paso, has repeatedly had to tell his clients that he doesnā€™t know where their kids are. ā€œI canā€™t promise that theyā€™ll be able to speak to their children,ā€ he wrote in an essay for the Washington Post, ā€œor know their whereabouts or who is taking care of them, or whether theyā€™ll be sent back home without their kids.ā€

Hanshew tells Mother Jones heā€™s seen no ā€œtangible changeā€ for his clients since Trumpā€™s executive order. He has represented about half a dozen parents who were separated from their children. Some of them still do not where their children are. Maureen Franco, the chief public defender in El Paso, says her lawyers and investigators are often able to determine the location of a clientā€™s child within a week. But she also mentioned a case in which it took four months to locate a separated child. Her staff has had to do double-duty representing people in court while also helping them find their kids.  

Part of the challenge, Hanshew says, is that the Office of Refugee Resettlement, which is responsible for housing and caring for migrant children, prefers to talk to parents directly, but doing that while ā€œtheyā€™re locked up in a cage in custody is nearly impossible.ā€ It would be much easier to coordinate with ORR if his clients were released while they await their trial. But federal attorneys have been fighting those efforts.

After their criminal prosecution hearings, parents have usually been transferred to ICE detention facilities where their struggles to find their kids have continued. There is an ICE flyer that provides parents with information on how to locate their children, but itā€™s unclear how many parents actually receive it. Elissa Steglich, an immigration law professor at the University of Texas at Austin, told Mother Jones last week that the process for finding children is ā€œnonexistent.ā€ She added, ā€œThe isolation and lack of information is just devastating.” Marsha Griffin, the co-chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics group on immigrant health, says the wrong name has been written down for some children, making it harder to locate them. 

Manoj Govindaiah, the director of family detention services for the immigrant advocacy group RAICES, says the group is still “feverishly working” to try to located separated kids and parents as they face a “convoluted and complicated” process. “ICE has been almost going on a PR blitz to say, ‘We are working on this…The fake media is making this into a much bigger problem than it is,'” Govindaiah adds. “But it is a huge problem.”

At the press conference on Friday morning, a reporter asked Olivares how the government is keeping track of children, and whether they have name tags or hospital bracelets. Like other advocates, Olivares said he was not sure. Heā€™d heard secondhand that some families had been photographed together before being separated. ā€œThat seems like a very rudimentary and fallible system to me,ā€ he added. ā€œBut I pray to God that no children [are] going to be misplaced.ā€

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate