Trump’s Child Separation Policy Is Too Much Even for Some of His Evangelical Fans

But others think “it’s very biblical to enforce the law.”

Faith leaders pray over Trump at the White HouseEvan Vucci/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In April, white evangelical support for Trump was at an all-time high. Seventy-five percent had a favorable view of the president, much higher than the 42 percent he enjoyed among all Americans. But the group that helped send Trump to the White House and has stood with him through every scandal and accusation of racism and bigotry, may finally be starting to splinter, thanks to the administration’s zero-tolerance immigration policy that has separated children from their parents.

In May, US Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced a new policy directive to address the flow of undocumented immigrants across the Mexican border: The federal government would be prosecuting anyone trying to cross without the proper paperwork, and children would be separated from their families. “If you cross this border unlawfully, then we will prosecute you. It’s that simple,” he said. “If you are smuggling a child, then we will prosecute you and that child will be separated from you as required by law.” In just six weeks, nearly 2,000 children have been separated from their families at the border. Images of crying children as young as two being taken from parents, or others of children placed in cages in holding cells, have dominated the media over the last several days. 

As the stories multiplied of the suffering of these children, members of Congress traveled to the facilities where the youngest victims of the new policy are being held. Meanwhile, the Trump administration sought to do damage control by asserting that what they were doing was lawful and not cruel.

Last week, Sessions decided to invoke a biblical justification for the actions when he was speaking to law enforcement officials. He cited Romans 13: “Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established.” But when he said, “the authorities that exist have been established by God,” to justify separating children from their parents at the border, he ignited a firestorm of protest from immigrant advocates. Many of his critics noted that the passage he chose was also used in the 19th century to defend slavery and in the 20th century by German theologians to justify Hitler

Even before Sessions quoted the Bible, a small group of Christian leaders from the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities and several different denominations had sent Trump a letter voicing their concern with the policy. “As evangelical Christians guided by the Bible, one of our core convictions is that God has established the family as the fundamental building block of society,” the eight signatories wrote. “The traumatic effects of this separation on these young children, which could be devastating and long-lasting, are of utmost concern.”

Even a few of those religious leaders who have consistently aligned themselves with Trump are beginning to speak out against the policy. Franklin Graham, one of Trump’s most prominent supporters, the son of the legendary Rev. Billy Graham and the head of the Samaritan’s Purse, an international relief organization, said on the Christian Broadcasting Network that the policy was disgraceful. “It’s terrible to see families ripped apart,” he said, “and I don’t support that one bit.”

He was not alone. Tony Suarez, the executive vice president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference and an informal advisor to Trump tweeted about the issue. 

Jentezen Franklin, a pastor who is a part of Trump’s evangelical council and stood by the president after white supremacists marched in Charlottesville, Virginia, plainly stated that Sessions was wrong to use the Bible to justify the policy. “It’s a very dangerous route to go when you begin to take selections of scriptures and say ‘the Bible was written to justify political standings,'” Franklin said in a CNN interview

While some Christian leaders have openly opposed Trump’s policy, others continue to toe the line. Tony Perkins, the president of the Family Research Council, is choosing to stand with Trump and blamed the parents who come with their children. “It’s impossible to feel anything but compassion for these kids, who must be dealing with a great deal of pain and confusion,” Perkins wrote in a blog post. “But the origin of that pain and confusion isn’t US law or the Trump administration. That burden lies with their parents who knowingly put them in this position. 

Jerry Falwell, Jr. the president of Liberty University—the country’s largest evangelical college—retweeted Fox News’ recap of Trump also shifting the blame to Democrats. 

Mark Burns, a prominent black Trump supporter and founder of the Harvest Praise & Worship Center in South Carolina, took to Twitter to equate separating children from their parents at the border to moving children in the United States to Child Protective Services after their parents are arrested.

During a White House press briefing following Sessions’ remarks, CNN’s Jim Acosta asked Press Secretary Sarah Sanders what the attorney general meant by his reference to Romans 13. While she said she was unaware of his comments, she saw no problem, adding, “It is very biblical to enforce the law. That is actually repeated a number of times throughout the Bible.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate