Medical Board Sanctions Celebrity Doctor for Letting Parents Opt Their Kids Out of Vaccines

Dr. Bob Sears gets 35 months probation.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In 2015, California made it illegal for parents to opt out of vaccinating their kids because of their beliefs. But that didn’t stop some anti-vaccine zealots from dodging the shots: Last year, Mother Jones reported on a cottage industry of Golden State doctors who help parents secure medical exemptions with little clinical explanation.

Last week, the Medical Board of California sent a strong message to physicians about such practices: It sentenced Dr. Bob Sears, a celebrity pediatrician and vaccine skeptic, to 35 months of probation for granting a child’s immunization waiver without sufficient medical justification.

The case, which happened in 2016, concerned a two-year-old boy whose mother reported to Sears that her son temporarily “went limp” and wasn’t able to urinate after receiving previous vaccinations. Sears admitted he didn’t document sufficient medical evidence that the boy’s condition was caused by the shots, but on Friday he wrote on Facebook that he considered the mother’s account proof enough. “A patient’s word is often the only evidence we have,” Sears wrote. “As doctors we must trust our patients, the same way our patients trust us to look out for their best interest.”

When the Medical Board of California first learned of the incident, it threatened to suspend Sears’ medical license. While on probation, Sears will have to be monitored by another physician. He will also have to take an ethics class and an additional 40 hours of continuing education. In an emailed comment, medical board spokesman Carlos Villatoro wrote: “The Board’s main goal is consumer protection through the licensing and regulation of doctor’s licenses. In the case against Dr. Sears, the Board determined that placing him on three years of probation would accomplish that goal.”

Sears, who declined to comment for this post, has long criticized vaccines, despite the resounding medical consensus that they’re both safe and necessary to prevent the outbreak of diseases. In 2007, he published The Vaccine Book, which recommends parents delay and stagger some vaccines instead of adhering to the schedule recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (Experts strongly recommend against delaying vaccines, which can leave children vulnerable to disease for longer—delaying the MMR shot may even cause seizures.)

Sears became an ally to the anti-vaccine community, and his critics say his ideas have contributed to the trend of parents refusing to immunize their children. In his Facebook post, Sears noted that the medical board “is already lining up four more cases” against him.

Catherine Flores Martin, executive director of the pro-vaccine California Immunization Coalition, says she hopes the board’s action will discourage like-minded doctors. She notes a small uptick in medical exemptions since last year, but says that may be because more private schools, which typically have lower vaccination rates, are now reporting their data to the government.

Most doctors, Flores Martin emphasizes, grant medical exemptions only when clinically necessary—for children with compromised immune systems, for example. But she says her group still regularly hears about a small number of California doctors who offer dodgy exemptions. “The more that doctors enable parents to refuse vaccinations, the more children and other vulnerable people are going to be at risk,” she says. “The idea that physicians—who have been trained in science—would reject science and make up their own rules, that’s troubling.”

This article has been updated.


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate