Jeff Sessions Just Accused Colleges of Creating “Sanctimonious, Sensitive, Supercilious Snowflakes”

This followed him laughing off chants of “lock her up.”

United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions looks on during a cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House. Olivier Douliery/picture-alliance/dpa/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Tuesday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions warned that colleges and universities are “coddling” young people instead of encouraging them to engage with different viewpoints. At a high school leadership summit hosted by Turning Point USA, a conservative national student group that promotes free-market principles, Sessions laughed off chants of “lock her up,” and escalated his rhetoric against college free-speech policies, both openly mocking universities and criticizing schools, in stark terms, for creating a “generation of sanctimonious, sensitive, supercilious snowflakes.”

Here are some of Sessions’ prepared remarks:

Through “trigger warnings” about “microaggressions,” cry closets, “safe spaces,” optional exams, therapy goats, and grade inflation, too many schools are coddling our young people and actively preventing them from scrutinizing the validity of their beliefs. That is the exact opposite of what they are supposed to do.

After the 2016 election, for example, they held a “cry-in” at Cornell, they had therapy dogs on campus at the University of Kansas, and Play-dough and coloring books at the University of Michigan. Students at Tufts were encouraged to “draw about their feelings.”

Rather than molding a generation of mature and well-informed adults, some schools are doing everything they can to create a generation of sanctimonious, sensitive, supercilious snowflakes.

That is a disservice to their students and a disservice to this nation.

If these remarks sound familiar, it’s because Sessions and his Justice Department colleagues have spoken often on how they feel colleges and universities are falling short when it comes to free speech on campuses, including those that protest conservative, and at times far-right, voices. At a speech at Georgetown University last September, Sessions warned that campuses have become “an echo chamber of political correctness and homogeneous thought, a shelter for fragile egos.” In January, his principal deputy attorney general, Jesse Panuccio, suggested that colleges should punish students who protest speakers, telling a crowd at Northwestern University, “If schools would impose serious consequences on those who shut down events and engage in violence, it is likely such tactics would abate.” 

Notably, Sessions told the crowd of high school students Tuesday that the Justice Department would continue to intervene in legal challenges against university free-speech policies. Since September, the agency has filed “statements of interest” in four lawsuits against colleges and universities brought by students challenging free speech policies, including a case at the University of California-Berkeley regarding policies adopted after the high-profile protests against conservative speakers that embroiled the campus last year. 

Most recently, in June, the department filed a brief in a case against the University of Michigan alleging that the university’s policies governing bias and harassment had a “profound chilling effect on protected expression.” The federal lawsuit, filed in May by the nonprofit Speech First, which advocates free-speech rights on campuses, argued that the definitions for harassment were too broad and that the university’s “bias response team,” a group of officials that investigate reports of bias on campus, posed a “grave threat to free expression.” The group’s complaint claimed the university’s policies had prevented three anonymous students from speaking openly about their views. In their court filing, Justice Department attorneys argued the university “imposes a system of arbitrary censorship of, and punishment for, constitutionally protected speech.”

The same day Justice Department attorneys filed the June brief, Michigan officials announced the university had narrowed the definitions for bullying and harassment. University spokesman Rick Fitzgerald told NBC News that month that the lawsuit “misstated University of Michigan policy and painted a false portrait of speech on our campus.” If Sessions follows through on his remarks today, the department’s intrusion on the free-speech case at the University of Michigan will not be the last. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate