Here’s the Latest High-Impact Expose on Sexual Harassment in the Media

Les Moonves reported misconduct caused CBS stock to fall by more than 6 percent.

Leslie Moonves in June 2017 at Radio City Music Hall./Imago via ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Sexual misconduct allegations against CBS chief executive Les Moonves have rocked the network, which saw its stock fall by more than six percent Friday after it announced an investigation into the charges.

A report by Ronan Farrow in the New Yorker described allegations by at least six women, including actress Illeana Douglas, writer Janet Jones, and producer Christine Peters. The women described Moonves, 68, forcibly kissing or groping them, often during professional meetings, in a series of incidents that occurred between the 1980s and the early 2000’s. 

“What happened to me was a sexual assault, and then I was fired for not participating,” Douglas told Farrow. She said that during a pitch meeting at his office at 20th Century Fox in 1985, when he was a TV executive, Moonves pinned her down on his office couch with her arms over her head and “violently” kissed her. When she tried to leave, she said the door was locked, and that Moonves only opened it after she threatened to scream. “You can’t breathe. You can’t move,” Douglass said. “The physicality of it was horrendous.”

This is the most recent of several significant stories by Farrow detailing sexual misconduct by powerful men in the media. His article about producer Harvey Weinstein won a Pulitzer Prize in April and helped launch the #MeToo movement. After reporting by Farrow and The New York Times, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. indicted Weinstein for two counts of rape and one first-degree charge of a criminal sex act related to alleged incidents in that occurred in 2004 and  2013. He was also indicted on three sexual assault charges related a 2006 incident. 

In May, Farrow’s report, with Jane Mayer, on allegations by four women of physical abuse by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman resulted in his resignation. Farrow told the Associated Press that all the women he quoted in the story about Moonves overcame “a lot of fear of retaliation to tell very serious stories of sexual misconduct.”

Moonves in statement Friday expressed contrition but also downplayed or denied some of the allegations. He has indicated no plans to resign. “I recognize that there were times decades ago when I may have made some women uncomfortable by making advances,” he said. “Those were mistakes, and I regret them immensely.” Moonves claimed some of the allegations were false and asserted that he did not misuse his or harm or hinder anyone’s career. 

Friday’s article described Moonves’ harassment as part of a broader culture at CBS, including its CBS News division. The report said that men in that division were promoted despite allegations of sexual misconduct that resulted in settlements with women who had made complaints. Farrow reports that 19 current and former CBS employees said Jeff Fager, who runs “60 Minutes,” enabled harassment. Some of the current and former employees also said Fager behaved inappropriately with female subordinates while intoxicated at company events. In November, CBS fired longtime host Charlie Rose over sexual harassment allegations.

In a separate statement issued to the New Yorker, CBS said it was investigating all the allegations in the article.

“CBS is very mindful of all workplace issues and takes each report of misconduct very seriously. We do not believe, however, that the picture of our company created in The New Yorker represents a larger organization that does its best to treat its tens of thousands of employees with dignity and respect,” the statement said. “We are seeing vigorous discourse in our country about equality, inclusion, and safety in the workplace, and CBS is committed to being part of the solution to those important issues.”

It’s not clear if Moonves can ride out the scandal, which comes amid a public legal battle with Shari Redstone, the majority stockholder of the CBS. Redstone sued the company and Moonves in May as part of complicated fight for control of the corporation. The allegations against Moonves could boost Redstone’s effort.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate