FCC Chair Ajit Pai Was Cagey About Sinclair Merger Communications, Watchdog Report Reveals

Couldn’t recall details of a chat with Jared Kushner; neglected to reveal one with White House Counsel.

The report reveals new communication between FCC Chairman Ajit Pai and Jared Kushner leading up to Sinclair's merger proposal.Jacquelyn Martin/ AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

An inspector general’s report found “no evidence, nor even the suggestion, of impropriety, unscrupulous behavior, or favoritism,” the Federal Communications Commission announced Monday, by Chairman Ajit Pai, who had pushed through rule changes favoring Sinclair Broadcast Group’s ultimately unsuccessful merger with Tribune Media. 

The 69-page report is the result of a nearly yearlong investigation into Pai, who has a long history of professional and personal connections with Sinclair. But the report left unanswered questions about communications between Pai, his staff, and stakeholders before and during the attempted merger.

As the New York Times reported, Pai met with Sinclair officials several times before President Donald Trump appointed him chairman of the FCC, and Sinclair’s top lobbyist also communicated frequently with FCC staff. In one instance, the IG’s report notes, Matthew Berry, Pai’s chief of staff, exchanged personal texts with Sinclair’s former senior VP of strategy and policy…

[Berry] received a one sentence text from Rebecca Hanson on his personal cell phone wherein she noted her [approval] of a statement made by the Chairman in a Congressional hearing (BERRY did not recall the date of this text message). BERRY does not recall having any substantive phone calls with representatives of Sinclair, including any lobbyists and lawyers representing Sinclair.

The report also provides insight into Pai’s relationship with the Trump administration. Pai maintains that Sinclair never came up in his private meetings with the president either during the nomination process or after he became chairman. But the IG’s report says Pai was unable to recall the content of a conversation he had with Jared Kushner in May 2017, five months after Pai met with Trump and then-adviser Peter Thiel at Trump Tower. By November, the FCC had voted to change its media ownership rules, clearing a key obstacle for the $3.9 billion Sinclair-Tribune merger. 

“I have called on the FCC for many years to update its outdated media ownership regulations to match the realities of the modern marketplace,” Pai said in press statement Monday. “As I said when this investigation was first announced, the suggestion that I favored any one company was absurd, and today’s report proves that Capitol Hill Democrats’ politically motivated accusations were entirely baseless.”

But there were additional communications Pai failed to reveal, according to the Inspector General’s report. In late July, he told a House oversight committee that the White House never contacted him about the FCC’s decision to have an administrative law judge review the Sinclair-Tribune merger. But at a Senate hearing August 16, Pai acknowledged he’d received a call one month earlier from White House Counsel Don McGahn, who wanted to discuss the merger’s status. (The report calls Pai and McGahn “long-time acquaintances.”)

Democrats were not at all appeased by the report. “It should not take an IG investigation to get answers to basic questions regarding independence and integrity,” Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ), a ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said in a statement. “Questions remain regarding the Chairman’s personal communications, which the IG noted were beyond his reach, and his conversations with Jared Kushner and Don McGhan. I’m glad the IG confirmed he will conduct an additional forensic examination on communications with the White House.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate