Keith Ellison Easily Wins Attorney General Nomination, in Spite of Abuse Allegations

The Minnesota congressman is accused of dragging an ex-girlfriend off a bed.

Craig Lassig/ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) easily won his party’s nomination to be the state’s next attorney general on Tuesday, dispatching the rest of the five-candidate field with nearly 50 percent of the vote. Ellison, the first Muslim ever to serve in Congress, is a favorite on the left for his progressive voting record, community organizing work, and support of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. But Ellison’s political future now looks increasingly uncertain amid new allegations of sexual abuse from an ex-girlfriend.

On Saturday, Austin Monahan, the son of Ellison’s ex-girlfriend Karen Monahan, published a Facebook post alleging that he’d seen a video of the Minnesota congressman dragging his mother off a bed. Ellison released a statement confirming he’d been in a relationship with Monahan that ended in 2016 but denying the alleged abuse. Minnesota Public Radio and CNN both reviewed texts between Ellison and Monahan from the time, none of which discussed abuse. But one 2017 text, after the relationship had ended, specifically referred to the alleged incident on the bed.

“Keith, We never discussedā€”the video I have of you trying to drag me off the bed, yelling get the fuck out now, calling me a bitch and saying I hate you bitch,” Monahan wrote, in one message obtained by CNN. Ellison did not respond to that message.

Monahan confirmed to MPR that a video did exist, though she said did not intend to release it because “it sets the expectation for survivors of all kinds of forms of abuse, whether it be abuse toward women, abuse from police officers, abuse from other people in power, to have to be the ones, like I’m doing right now, to show and prove their stories.” She said she hadn’t intended to come forward, but her son’s post had forced her hand. Ellison has denied any wrongdoing.

Monahan is not the first woman to allege mistreatment by Ellison. During his first run for Congress in 2006, Amy Alexander, a former progressive political activist in the Twin Cities who said she had been in a relationship with the then-married Ellison, alleged that Ellison had come to her house, grabbed and shoved her, and broken her screen door. She also alleged that Ellison’s lawyer had approached her the day of the district nominating convention to ask her to keep quiet. Ellison deflected the accusations, accusing Alexander and an associate of extortion and suggesting that she was upset at not being hired by his environmental justice group. In the end, it was Ellison who secured a restraining order against Alexander. Alexander was barred by a judge from discussing the matter further.

Thus far, Ellison hasn’t faced the kind of resounding calls from colleagues to step aside that compelled Minnesota Sen. Al Franken to resign last spring following a string of allegations of groping. The National Organization for Women called on Ellison to drop out, and the Sierra Club, Monahan’s employer, released a statement standing by Monahan and saying it was “deeply troubled and disturbed” by the allegations. But no other major progressive institutions and organizationsā€”most notably, the Democratic National Committee, where Ellison serves as deputy chairā€”have stepped in to do the same.

Ellison, for his part, isn’t acting like someone in the midst of a possible career-ending story. After his race was called on Tuesday, he dropped by a victory party for his House colleague Tim Walz, who won the Democratic nomination for governor. Over the next three months, other Minnesota Democrats may find their positionā€”and hisā€”increasingly untenable, but for one night at least, no one seemed to care:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate