The Growing List of Hackings Ahead of the 2018 Midterm Elections

The latest: Microsoft announced Tuesday the Kremlin targeted anti-Trump GOP think tanks.

Sharifulin Valery/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In a startling announcement Tuesday, Microsoft revealed that the same Kremlin-backed military intelligence unit believed to have carried out the 2016 hacking of the Democratic National Committee attempted last week to target the US Senate and conservative think tanks that have broken with President Donald Trump.

While the company said those efforts by Russia’s “Fancy Bear” hackers were ultimately thwarted through a court order that provided it control of six suspicious domains that were created to steal personal information and passwords, Tuesday’s alarming disclosure comes as only the most recent example in recent weeks of detected attempts that appear intended to influence the fast-approaching November elections. These known efforts have largely targeted vulnerable Democrats, contradicting Trump’s staggering insistence last month that Russia is fighting “very hard” against Republicans this year.

July 26, Sen. Claire McCaskill 

Already facing an uphill battle for reelection in a state that overwhelmingly voted for Trump, Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) confirmed a Daily Beast report that “Fancy Bear” had attempted to hack into her office’s computer network. “While this attack was not successful, it is outrageous that they think they can get away with this,” McCaskill said in a statement. “I will not be intimidated. I’ve said it before and I will say it again, Putin is a thug and a bully.” 

The attack on the Missouri senator, which was first detected and brought to the attention of McCaskill’s office by Microsoft, marked the first known target of the midterm elections.

July 29, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen

When asked about the unsuccessful hacking attempt into McCaskill’s computer network during an appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) revealed that her office had also detected suspicious phishing scams. She said the situation was eventually turned over to authorities. “We’re hearing that this is widespread with political parties across the country, as well as with members of the Senate,” Shaheen said. “So this is a very big issue and it’s something that we need to address in a bipartisan way.

August 8, Florida Election Systems

Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), who is similarly facing a tough reelection bid against Republican Gov. Rick Scott in the swing state of Florida, revealed to the Tampa Bay Times that Russian hackers had gained access to the state’s election systems. “They have already penetrated certain counties in the state and they now have free rein to move about,” Nelson told the paper. 

In turn, Scott accused Nelson of either leaking classified information or “simply making things up.” He demanded that Nelson provide further information to back the hacking claims. On Friday, Nelson tweeted an NBC report with the headline “Bill Nelson wasn’t making things up when he said Russians hacked Florida election systems” that appeared to do just that:

August 15, Hans Keirstead

Documents obtained by Rolling Stone revealed that for the past year the FBI had investigated numerous cyberattacks—some successful—that targeted Hans Keirstead, a Democratic challenger of Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.), widely referred to as “Putin’s favorite congressman.”

After coming in third in the state’s June 5 primary, Keirstead went on to endorse fellow Democratic candidate Harley Rouda to face Rohrabacher. But Keirstead’s campaign said it was now publicizing the hacking efforts in order to sound the alarm and warn voters. “It is clear from speaking with campaign professionals around the country that the sustained attacks the Keirstead for Congress campaign faced were not unique but have become the new normal for political campaigns in 2018,” campaign manager Kyle Quinn-Quesada told Rolling Stone.

August 18, David Min

In a situation similar to that of Keirstead, sources told Reuters that the FBI was investigating a successful cyberattack against David Min, a Democratic congressional candidate in California’s 45th congressional district who was ultimately defeated in the state’s June primary. A source later told CNN that the DNC had described the attack as one of the most “sophisticated” it had witnessed this election cycle.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate