The Former Teacher of the Year Just Won Her Congressional Primary

Jahana Hayes could become the only black member of Congress from New England.

Jahana Hayes reacts as she introduces President Barack Obama during an event at the White House on May 3, 2016.Olivier Douliery/Pool/ABACAPRES.COM via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Jahana Hayes—who was named the 2016 Teacher of the Year by President Barack Obama—just won her underdog primary in Connecticut’s 5th Congressional District, bringing her one step closer to becoming the first black Democrat to serve the state in Congress.

Hayes had been teaching history in her hometown of Waterbury, Connecticut, one of the state’s poorest cities, when she received the White House distinction. She was serving as a talent and professional development supervisor for the city’s school district when she entered the congressional race.

A first-time office-seeker, Hayes’ background stands a stark contrast to that of the state’s all-white congressional delegation. In addition to being a teacher, she grew up in public housing with a mother who suffered from addiction. When she was still a teenager, Hayes became a single mother. Now a mother of four, Hayes is married to a police detective.

Should she win in November, she could become New England’s only black member of Congress. (Ayanna Pressley, who is black, is seeking the Democratic nomination for the 7th Congressional District in Massachusetts, which holds primaries next month.)

The incumbent, Rep. Elizabeth Esty (D), declined to run for reelection following reports that she’d continued employing her chief of staff after learning of allegations that he had threatened a former staffer’s life. The unexpected vacancy left national and state Democrats scrambling to find a replacement for the Democratic-leaning district. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee asked Mark Barden and Nicole Hockley, two parents who lost children in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, to run for Esty’s seat. They ultimately declined, opting to dedicate their time to Sandy Hook Promise, the school safety advocacy organization they founded in the wake of their children’s deaths.

Sen. Chris Murphy, who has taken a leading role in the state Democratic Party as he seeks reelection, helped to recruit Hayes into the race in early May. Her opponent, former town first selectman Mary Glassman, had a $75,000 fundraising head start over Hayes and soon thereafter received the state party’s endorsement, a backing that tends to boost candidates in the August primary.

Until Esty’s resignation, Connecticut’s congressional races had been expected to be veritable snoozefests. It’s been 10 years since a Republican has represented Connecticut in Congress, and all the incumbents had expected to waltz to reelection. Though President Donald Trump’s relative success with white, blue-collar voters in the state’s 2nd and 5th districts had encouraged Republicans to list both seats as targets early last year, the party later dropped them.

Should Hayes win the general election, she’ll be the third member of Congress to represent Newtown following the 2012 massacre. On Sunday, she attended the March for Our Lives student rally in Newtown, where she mingled with young activists seeking to curb gun violence. She told Mother Jones that, as a teacher at a different Connecticut school, the Newtown shooting impacted her in a deeply personal way. “I remember students just trying to filter through all of this information that they were getting,” she recalls of her students that day. “As their teacher standing in front of the room, [I was] trying just to keep them calm, to not ignite any hysteria.”

Hayes says she was motivated to run in part by Congress’ failure to address school violence. “It’s the shame of this nation and the shame of this state that we’re still having these conversations,” she says, adding that she’d like to bring the gun laws that Connecticut has passed—like universal background checks—to the federal level.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate