The Republican Primary for Jeff Flake’s Senate Seat is a Hot Mess

It features charges of assault, drunken karaoke, and bribery. And that’s just a start.

From left: Martha McSally, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and Kelli WardMother Jones illustration

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On a Thursday evening in early August, Joe Arpaio, the former Maricopa County sheriff and current Republican candidate for US Senate from Arizona, dropped by a community center in Phoenix for his first public campaign event in weeks.

The host, John Rodriguez, was a local news columnist, professional sports agent, and longtime Arpaio critic, who promisedā€”according to the announcementā€”there would be ā€œNO questions off limits as per our mutual agreement.ā€ Given the general tenor of the campaign to date, fireworks seemed likely.

The Republican primary to replace retiring Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), which will be decided on Tuesday, has been a glimpse into what happens when internet comment threads swallow a political movement. In the final month of the race, Arpaio’s campaign has accused one top rival, former state Sen. Kelli Ward, of assault; intoxication; and bribery. Wardā€™s campaign has, in turn, labeled Arpaio ā€œsick and sadā€ and suggested ā€œGod will weigh in” on the 86-year-old ex-sheriff. In doing so, they have helped make possible the one scenario they both agree is untenableā€”a likely primary victory for Rep. Martha McSally, a favorite of Washington Republicans who once called Trump ā€œdisgustingā€ but now embraces his administration almost as tightly as they do. The timing couldnā€™t be worse. For the first time in decades, a Democrat, Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, is leading in the polls for an Arizona Senate seatā€”a race that could hold the key to which party controls the upper chamber.

Fifteen minutes after the event was supposed to start, the rows of seats in the small rec room were almost entirely empty. The campaign entourage and a few members of the press outnumbered voters. And it turned out that some subjects were, in fact, off-limits. When the q-and-a wrapped, about half an hour ahead of schedule, two questions written out beforehand on note cards had still gone un-asked. Each captured the state of Arpaio’s campaign in their own unique way. A woman named Susan wanted to know if Arpaio was being taken advantage of by his campaign staff. The other was from ā€œJack,ā€ who asked: ā€œWhat happened with Borat?ā€

What happened with Borat, in the broadest sense, was this: for the first time in months, people were actually talking about a man who had once held the most populous county in the state in his fist. Just days before he took up the microphone in Phoenix, Arpaio had appeared in an episode of Sacha Baron Cohenā€™s new Showtime series, ā€œWho Is America.ā€ The comedian, now in character as a Finnish media personality named OMGWhizzBoyOMG, asked Arpaio if he would accept a blow job from Trump. Arpaio said that he would. It was not, perhaps, the optimal answer to the question, but it was in keeping with a campaign that has been a blunder at every junction.

It wasnā€™t always this way. Had his town hall been held two years agoā€”before Arpaio was defeated by a Democratic challenger, convicted by a federal judge of defying a court order to stop racial profiling, and subsequently pardoned by Trumpā€”he might have been mobbed by protestors or supporters, either of which would suit his purposes just fine. During his 24-year tenure as sheriff, Arpaio cultivated a reputation as the most notorious law-enforcement officer in America, trailed unfailingly by an entourage of television cameras, Republican dignitaries, and lawsuits.

The lawlessness with which Arpaio made his name would eventually prove his undoing. A 2011 Department of Justice investigation found that he ā€œengages in a systemic disregard for basic constitutional protectionsā€ by targeting Latino residents, whom his detention officers variously described as ā€œwetbacksā€ and ā€œMexican bitches.ā€ (His refusal to halt discriminatory practices was what led to his conviction.) Beside the immigration sweeps, there was everything elseā€”wrongful death lawsuits; ā€œTent City,ā€ the massive outdoor jail Arpaio himself described as a ā€œconcentration camp,ā€ where inmates baked in 120-degree heat; an attention-seeking investigation into President Barack Obamaā€™s citizenship. While his department zealously targeted immigrants (and people it thought looked like immigrants), 400 sex crimes went unsolved in Arpaioā€™s jurisdiction, a statistic so staggering that for maybe the only time in his career, he apologized. Arpaio once put two alt-weekly reporters in a cage for reporting too critically on himā€”that one cost the county $3.75 million.

As with other Republicans who have faced legal trouble in recent yearsā€”including the West Virginia coal baron Don Blankenship and the president himselfā€”Arpaio has cast himself, with some success, as the victim of a political ā€œwitch hunt.ā€ At the town hall, like so many other forums, he described his conviction as a ā€œMickey Mouse misdemeanor.ā€ Elsewhere he has blamed his downfall on Barack Obama and George Soros. The first poll of the race after Arpaio announced his candidacy last fall suggested voters might buy itā€”he was only two points back of the lead.

But in the months since, the ex-lawman has lost ground. Heā€™s raised a fraction of what he used to spend on county sheriff races, and embarked on a series of unusual campaign ventures. In July, hoping to recapture some of his tough-on-immigrant magic, he planned a trip to Mexico to meet with local government officials, accompanied by a team of beefy but slightly past-expired security guards he called the ā€œArpaio Special Ops.ā€ He got to the border and balked, alleging that there was a $10,000 price on his head. A few days later, Arpaio filmed a Facebook video at the border with Shiva Ayyadurai, an independent candidate for US Senate in Massachusetts, who claims to be the inventor of email. Arpaio and Ayyadurai have endorsed each other. Ditto Arpaio and Courtland Sykes, a losing US Senate candidate from Missouri who is best-known for declaring in a manifesto that he didn’t want his daughters to turn into ā€œnail-biting manophobic hell-bent feminist she devils.ā€ As recently as 2012, an Arpaio endorsement was described as ā€œthe hottest endorsement of the Republican [presidential] raceā€; now he gets this guy:

Arpaioā€™s most natural rival in the three-candidate field is Ward, an emergency-room doctor who previously challenged Sen. John McCain in the Republican primary two years ago. Ward attacked McCain during that campaign as a ā€œweakā€ and ā€œoldā€ man. After McCain announced that he had cancer last year, she doubled down, suggesting that he should ā€œstep asideā€ so she could be appointed to his seat. McCain died on Saturday. 

Ward was the right-wing champion of last resort in 2016, after a handful of bigger-name Republican elected officials passed on the primary. And it showed. McCain and his allies covered the airwaves with ads highlighting her use of state resources to hold a public forum on the conspiracy theory that airplanes were dispersing mind-control chemicals over the state in order to subjugate the populace. One ad dubbed her ā€œChemtrail Kelliā€:

Still, she got nearly 40 percent of the vote against perhaps the most famous politician the state has ever produced, a measure, in the year of Trump, of the intense level of dissatisfaction rank-and-file conservatives had with their elected officials. Ward announced her campaign against Flake even before the 2016 election came to a close and in the short window the next year, between when Flake theatrically renounced Trump and when he announced he was quitting, she was an unlikely front-runner. The high water mark came last fall, when Trump tweeted, ā€œGreat to see that Dr. Kelli Ward is running against Flake Jeff Flake.ā€ Twelve months later, no further words of encouragement have been forthcoming, but it is still the pinned Tweet on her Twitter page and features prominently on her mailers.

Ward had a good chance at beating Flake and still has a puncherā€™s chance on Tuesday. Several members of Congress, including Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar, have endorsed her. But sheā€™s still, at heart, the ex-state senator who held a hearing on chemtrails. Over the final weekend of the campaign she went on a bus tour with not just Gosar and Rand Paul, but also Mike Cernovich, the alt-right fixture who helped popularize the fake theory that prominent Washington Democrats were running a pedophile ring out of a pizza joint. Ward said she didnā€™t know much about Cernovichā€™s views but that she didnā€™t care either, because he had an important audience she was hoping to reach. It was almost verbatim what sheā€™d told me two years ago about her appearance on Alex Jonesā€™ show.

Because Arpaio and Ward both lay claim to being the true Trump candidate in the race, there is an existential struggle at the heart of their feudā€”the existence of the other makes the success of either impossible. Two weeks ago, anti-Ward forces began circulating a video that purported to show Ward singing Grandmaster Flash ā€œdrunk…in an alleged swingers bar in Lake Havasu.ā€ The video came from two former Ward staffers who had defected to Arpaioā€™s campaign. A few days later, an Arpaio staffer accused Ward of assaulting the candidate at a county fair. (Ward allegedly threw a campaign pin at the former sheriff; her campaign did not respond to a request for comment.) The most serious allegation, which Arpaio repeated in Phoenix almost as an aside, was that Ward had attempted to offer him money to leave the race.

Wait a second, bribery?

It turns out itā€™s complicated. ā€œThere are reports out there that a certain Senate candidate on the other side sent one of her people in and made Joe an offer and that was that, and obviously, thatā€™s where weā€™re leaving it, heā€™s still in the race,ā€ his spokeswoman, Jennifer Lawrence, told me afterwards. Had the campaign actually filed a complaint about it? Well, no. But a former Ward volunteer had. Who had the complaint been submitted to? ā€œThe FEC,ā€ said campaign manager Chris Hegstrom, referring to the Federal Election Commission. ā€œActually, wait, it wasnā€™t the FEC it was submitted to,ā€ he saidā€”it was the Department of Justice.

ā€œLook, weā€™re just trying to run a regular campaign,ā€ he said. ā€œWeā€™re here to win. We donā€™t have time to get bogged down in those things. If someone felt there was something wrong, okay, there probably was. But we just want to move forward.ā€

Except for Arpaio, who talked about it again the next day. In a normal race, an attempted bribe to exit the race seems like itā€™d be a big story, but Arpaio was also the man who claimed to have uncovered new evidence about Obamaā€™s birth certificate. Big allegations require a certain amount of documentation, which at this point seems like itā€™ll never come. (Ward’s campaign has denied that any sort of offer was made.)

Since Trump appeared on the national stage, much has been made about Trumpism without Trumpā€”that the president’s agenda of white identity politics could be even more potent with a more refined personality behind it. But in Arizona, at least, Trumpism without the singular force of Trump to hold it together gets to the Lord of the Flies stage really quick.

Through all of this, McSally, a former fighter pilot, has largely and wisely kept quiet. After flirting with immigration reform earlier in her career, and at one point even supporting legal status for Dreamers, she reversed course in the runup to the Senate campaign. She now backs the wall (McSally has joked that sheā€™d extend it to protect her state from California), and in her campaign announcement video she bragged at length of not having bowed “to Shariah law.ā€ Trump even makes an appearance, calling her ā€œmy friendā€ and ā€œthe real deal.ā€ (Trump has not endorsed; it was a clip from last yearā€™s Air Force commencement speech, held in Colorado Springs.)

McSally declined to debate her two primary rivals, and the two Republican super-PACs that are supporting her, Senate Leadership Fund and Defend Arizona, have ignored Arpaio and focused their fire on Ward. In a pair of ads virtually recycled from the 2016 campaign, they attack ā€œChemtrail Kelliā€ for her fringe conspiracy theories and occasional libertarian streak. One ad, similar to a pro-McCain spot from two years ago, equates a bill she pushed in the state legislature that would have blocked local law enforcement agencies from cooperating with the National Security Agency with the conservative bĆŖte noir of sanctuary cities. Everything is about the Wall now, even when the Wall never comes up:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eudu9G6DZL0

Arpaioā€™s campaign is equal parts focused on his own career in Maricopa County and on his early and unrestrained support of President Donald Trump. Arpaio supported Trumpā€™s campaign months before his nomination seemed likely. He spoke at the Republican National Convention. And he was Trumpā€™s first presidential pardon. He has even borrowed one of Trumpā€™s campaign tactics, touring the state with so-called ā€œAngel families,ā€ who had loved ones killed by undocumented residents. (Two of them spoke before Arpaio at the town hall.) But Trump has not endorsed his friendā€™s campaignā€”even when the alternative is a congresswoman who still wonā€™t say who she voted for in 2016.

The sheriff wouldnā€™t take questions from Mother Jones after the event in Phoenix, but when I asked his campaign about the presidentā€™s silence on the race, his spokeswoman hedged. ā€œListen, he has a busy job, heā€™s the president of the United States,ā€ Lawrence said.

Itā€™s always possible. Thereā€™s 24 hours left. But for the first time in his career, the emotion elicited by Arpaio is not anger or fear or even respect. Itā€™s something more damningā€”ambivalence.

Image credits: Bill Clark/CQ/ZUMA; Jack Kurtz/ZUMA; Jeff Malet/Newscom/ZUMA; Getty

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate