August 19, 2018

Trump Attacks 2 Favorite Targets in Sunday Morning Tweetstorm

Hint, one of them is the “failing New York Times.”

August 17, 2018 - Washington, District of Columbia, U.S. - President Donald J. Trump meets reporters during an impromptu press availability on the South Lawn of the White House. Ron Sachs/CNP via ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

President Donald Trump took some time off from golfing at his Bedminster, New Jersey, resort this morning to attack the “failing New York Times” for publishing a “fake piece” about “White House Councel [sic] Don McGahn” and his extraordinary cooperation with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation. In a string of angry tweets, Trump compared the special counsel to late anti-communist crusader Sen. Joseph McCarthy (R-Wisc.):

The Times reported Saturday that the White House allowed investigators to interview McGahan for nearly 30 hours over three days in the Russia inquiry, declining to assert any claims of executive privilege. Unfettered, McGahan apparently provided investigators with extensive insights into some of the most critical moments in the Trump presidency as they relate to allegations of campaign collusion with the Russians to interfere with the 2016 presidential election and its potential obstruction of justice. Those include Trump’s firing of FBI director James Comey, as well as his efforts to demand that Attorney General Jeff Sessions assume oversight of the special counsel investigation, despite Sessions’ pledge to recuse himself from the inquiry. 

The Times painted a portrait of a paranoid White House counsel under siege, seeking to save his own skin by asserting his own innocence to investigators, though not the president’s. Trump has blamed many of his legal woes on McGahn, who apparently suspected that Trump might try to throw him under the bus and blame him for possible illegal acts of obstruction of justice committed by others close to Trump—or Trump himself.

The Times suggests McGahn spilled his guts to the special counsel before that could happen. From the Times:

At the same time, Mr. Trump was blaming Mr. McGahn for his legal woes, yet encouraging him to speak to investigators. Mr. McGahn and his lawyer grew suspicious. They began telling associates that they had concluded that the president had decided to let Mr. McGahn take the fall for decisions that could be construed as obstruction of justice, like the Comey firing, by telling the special counsel that he was only following shoddy legal advice from Mr. McGahn.

Worried that Mr. Trump would ultimately blame him in the inquiry, Mr. McGahn told people he was determined to avoid the fate of the White House counsel for President Richard M. Nixon, John W. Dean, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy to obstruct justice in the Watergate scandal.

Mr. McGahn decided to fully cooperate with Mr. Mueller. It was, he believed, the only choice he had to protect himself.

Trump took issue with this characterization, firing back on Twitter (with the same spelling errors):

As Mother Jones‘ Andy Kroll wrote in June last year, as White House counsel, McGahn has one main job: to protect the president. But Trump’s relationship with McGahn, one of his earliest hires during his presidential campaign, has long been strained as the former election law lawyer has attempted to guide Trump through a series of legal landmines of the president’s own making. Even then, it was clear that McGahn was failing at that job. And now, the Times suggests that despite Trump’s protests to the contrary, McGahn may have decided that at this point in the Trump administration, the only person he can really protect is himself.

For a deeper dive into the White House counsel now at the center of this controversy, see this Mother Jones story.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate