Former Trump Campaign Aide Suggests Trump Supported Meeting Russians

Lawyers for George Papadopoulos try to prove his usefulness to prosecutors by throwing Jeff Sessions under the bus.

FILE - In this Dec. 15, 2017, file photo, President Donald Trump sits with Attorney General Jeff Sessions during the FBI National Academy graduation ceremony in Quantico, Va. Evan Vucci/AP Photo

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Lawyers for a former Trump campaign adviser say that both Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the candidate favored the idea of a meeting between Vladimir Putin and the campaign. Sessions had said, in sworn testimony to Congress, that he opposed the proposal to meet with the Russian president. 

The new details come from court documents filed late Friday night by the lawyers of George Papadopoulos, President Trump’s one-time foreign policy adviser who pleaded guilty in October to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian government agents. Papadopoulos may have been the first person in Trump’s orbit to learn that the Russians had a massive trove of emails damaging to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. And he was the first person charged by special counsel Robert Mueller as part of his probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign.

He’s scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 7 and faces up to six months in jail. As part of those proceedings, Papadopoulos’s lawyers are attempting to persuade a judge to keep him out of jail on the grounds that he was simply lying to try to save his career—and possibly Trump’s presidency—not to further any sort of Russian plot.

In asking for leniency, Papadopoulos suggests that he’s been helpful to the special counsel’s office investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign. As evidence, his lawyers say that he told investigators that when he proposed arranging a meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin, Trump “nodded with approval,” and that now-Attorney Jeff Sessions, who was in the room, “appeared to like the idea and stated that the campaign should look into it.” Prosecutors have said that in fact Papadopoulos was not particularly helpful with the investigation and that his lies to the FBI seriously damaged the work of the special counsel. In his new sentencing memo, his lawyers portray him as a hapless climber, who at 28-years-old was innocently entangled in a web of international affairs beyond his understanding.

Politico notes:

The defense filing often refers to Papadopoulos by his first name alone—an approach that seems aimed at portraying him as a naif surrounded by far more sophisticated players. At one point, the submission refers to Papadopoulos—who was 28 at the time of his encounters in London—as “young George.” Intentionally or not, some passages seem to evoke the “Curious George” children’s stories, where a wide-eyed monkey is constantly amazed and surprised by his more savvy human companions.

His lawyers write that Papadopoulos says that he lied to the FBI to “save his professional aspirations and preserve a perhaps misguided loyalty to his master.” Read the entire document here.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate