Republicans Are Running Some Really Weird Ads About This Texas Candidate’s Name

GOP groups are attacking Gina Ortiz Jones for using her middle name.

Gina Ortiz Jones

NRCC/YouTube

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Control of the House of Representatives might be decided in Texas, where Democrats have a candidate in every district for the first time since the early 1980s, giving them at least a prayer of flipping seats in a half-dozen races. But prior to this year, there was only one true swing district in the heavily gerrymandered stateā€”the 23rd District, which stretches from San Antonio to El Paso and is currently represented by second-term Republican Will Hurd. A majority of the district’s residents are Hispanic, and Hispanic voters in Texas lean Democratic.

Which helps to explain why the National Republican Congressional Committee would devote an entire 30-second ad to Democratic challenger Gina Ortiz Jones’ middle name:

The Congressional Leadership Fund, a super-PAC associated with House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), tried a similar approach with its own ad this week:

Ortiz Jones takes her middle name from her mother, Victorina Ortiz, a Filipina immigrant. (Her fatherā€”a Jonesā€”was not a part of her life.) She does not describe herself as Latina, and she is upfront about her heritage. Indeed, if there is one thing people outside the district likely know about Gina Ortiz Jones, it is that she is vying to be the first-ever Filipina American in Congress. (She would also be Texas’ first openly LGBT member of Congressā€”though by no means its first Air Force veteran.)

The implication from the ad is that Ortiz Jones is using her middle name to pander for votes among Mexican Americans. In doing so, it reprises an issue that arose briefly in the Democratic primary. ā€œWe have some candidates and the district thinks that theyā€™re Hispanic because of a middle name, and they think that theyā€™re going to elect the first Latina, and theyā€™re mistaken, because this candidate is Asian,ā€ one opponent, Angela Villescaz, said at a debate. Another insisted on referring to her, much like the NRCC and CLF, as Gina Jones. But her full name really is Gina Ortiz Jones, whether she’s always used it or not, and lengthening or shortening a name, for simplicity or familiarity or formality, is a classic candidate’s prerogative.

There is a certain irony here, though, in the context of politics in 2018. Groups like the NRCC and CLF are scrubbing Ortiz Jones’ identity in one district, even as they’re spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to remind voters in upstate New York that a Democratic candidate is black.

Hurd, for his part, has managed to ride out the possible Democratic wave better than most of his colleagues, in part by presenting himself as above the fray of partisan sniping. (And in part, no doubt, because national Republican groups, such as the NRCC and CLF, have spent vast gobs of money on his behalf.) He was one of the few Republican members of Congress to hold frequent town halls in 2017, when his colleagues were facing the full ire of progressive activists, and in a district carried easily by Hillary Clinton in 2016, he has declined to endorse Republican Sen. Ted Cruz in his reelection bid against Democratic Rep. Beto O’Rourke. A New York Times poll of the race this month gave Hurd an eight-point lead.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate