Guatemala Guts a Respected Anti-Corruption Commission Following GOP Critiques

Republican legislators have made what experts say are unfounded allegations of Russian influence over the commission.

Vice President Mike Pence shakes hands with Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales in Guatemala in June 2018. Orlando Estrada/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Guatemalan government has blocked the head of a widely respected anti-corruption body from reentering the country. The move this week follows unsubstantiated allegations from Republican lawmakers about Russian influence over the International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala, or CICIG, and it has prompted an unusually quiet response from the US government.

Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales’ decision to block CICIG director IvĆ”n VelĆ”squez from returning to Guatemala is widely seen as an attempt to obstruct the commission’s probe into alleged wrongdoing by Morales and his family. CICIG has accused Morales of accepting about $1 million in illegal campaign contributions and is trying to strip him of his political immunity. CICIG and Guatemalan prosecutors have also pursued fraud charges against Morales’ son and brother. Morales, who rose to prominence as a comedian, ran on the slogan “Neither corrupt nor a thief.”

Last Friday, Moralesā€”flanked by members of the military and policeā€”said he would not renew CICIG’s mandate after it expires in September 2019 and accused the body of “sowing judicial terror in Guatemala.” Guatemalan military-grade trucks were spotted outside CICIG’s office and the embassies of the United States and other countries shortly before his speech. 

Morales wrote last week in a letter to UN Secretary-General AntĆ³nio Guterres that CICIG will have to transfer its responsibilities to Guatemalan state institutions. On Tuesday, the Guatemalan government announced it would prevent VelĆ”squez from returning to the country following a trip to the United States, calling VelĆ”squez a threat to order and public security in Guatemala. Guterres said in a statement that he has asked VelĆ”squez to continue running CICIG “until there is more clarity on the situation.” He said CICIG and VelĆ”squez “play a pivotal role in the fight against impunity in Guatemala.”

In June 2017, Vice President Mike Pence emphasized CICIG’s importance and “acknowledged President Morales’ personal dedication” to fighting corruption during a meeting between the two leaders, according to a White House press release. But Morales’ attacks on CICIG have not provoked much outcry from the United States. After Morales announced he would not renew CICIG’s mandate, the US embassy in Guatemala called CICIG “an effective and important partner in fighting impunity” and said the United States will “continue to support Guatemala’s fight against corruption and impunity.” The statement did not directly criticize Morales, whom the Trump administration sees as an ally in the drug war and a strong supporter of Israel. (In May, Guatemala was the first nation to follow the US lead in moving its Israeli embassy to Jerusalem.) 

The United States did not join a statement released by Canada and European nations on Wednesday that criticized the decision to block VelĆ”squez from returning to Guatemala. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called Morales on Thursday and discussed the importance of working with CICIG, according to State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert. Pompeo also expressed “continued support” for a “reformed CICIG,” but it is unclear what that means.

Former Vice President Joe Biden criticized the move to disband CICIG in a tweet:

CICIG is highly popular among Guatemalans and international anti-corruption advocates. As Mother Jones reported in May:

[CICIG] was created in 2007 to help Guatemalan prosecutors take down criminal organizations that coopted government institutions after a 1996 peace deal ended 36 years of civil war. The commission has been seen as a rare bright spot in a region plagued by endemic corruption and has traditionally had broad bipartisan support in Congress. The United States provides about half of CICIG’s funding. [The Washington Office on Latin America] concluded in a June 2015 report that CICIG has “achieved transcendental results” and recommended that Honduras and El Salvador consider creating similar commissions.

But the body has come under scrutiny from Republican legislators in recent months who argue that a Russian family living in Guatemala was unfairly targeted by CICIG for buying fake passports. In May, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) temporarily blocked US funding for CICIG due to concerns about Russian influence over the body. Latin America experts said there was no evidence to support claims that CICIG is a Kremlin tool:

Jo-Marie Burt, a professor of Latin American studies at George Mason University and a senior fellow at the Washington Office on Latin America, told the Guardian, “Rubio changed policy after hearing one sideā€¦This is a classic fake news scenario.” Adriana BeltrĆ”n, a Guatemala expert at WOLA, tells Mother Jones she’s seen no evidence of collusion between Russia and the commission. Eric Olson, the deputy director of the Wilson Center’s Latin American Program, is similarly skeptical. To satisfy critics like Rubio, CICIG’s defenders would have to prove that Russia did not corrupt the commissionā€”a task Olson compares to proving that the moon isn’t “made of Swiss cheese.”

Rubio called Morales a “great friend” of the United States in February and called him “mi amigo” in a Spanish tweet on Thursday, the day before Morales announced he was phasing out CICIG. Rubio’s office has not commented on Morales’ recent actions against CICIG. Reps. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) and Albio Sires (D-N.J.), who serve on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement that Congress must do everything in its power to “appropriately adjust US assistance to the Guatemalan government” if Morales doesn’t allow VelĆ”squez back in. Engel told Mother Jones in a statement in May that the “only winners from attacks on CICIG are the country’s most corrupt.” He added, “We cannot allow Russia to be used as a bogeyman to damage years of progress in the fight against corruption in Guatemala.”

The Washington Office on Latin America noted on Wednesday that the trucks spotted outside the CICIG office and embassies on Friday were donated by the US Defense Department to fight corruption and drug trafficking. Pompeo singled out those efforts on Saturday.

“Our relationship with Guatemala is important,” he wrote on Twitter. “We greatly appreciate Guatemala’s efforts in counternarcotics and security.” He did not mention Morales or CICIG. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) called Pompeo’s tweet “bizarre,” saying in a statement that it was “a bit like being told that the courthouse is on fire and responding that the stock market is up.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate