Why Did This GOP Candidate for Governor of Pennsylvania Tell a Bizarre Story About Raccoons?

It came from Infowars.

Christopher Millette/Erie Times-News via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

An Infowars post from early 2016 was revived on the campaign trail in Pennsylvania last week and, well, things got weird. 

Republican candidate Scott Wagner, a former state senator, has not been shy about his affection for President Donald Trump as he aims to become governor in a state the president won. Like the president, Wagner began his career in private business—a trash collection firm rather than a real estate empire—and has paired a brash, “no apologies” style of campaigning with a populist appeal to Pennsylvanian workers. He also, naturally, has declined to release his tax returns

But expressions of admiration took a bizarre turn last week during a campaign stop in Wilkes-Barre, a city in the northeastern part of the state. In an attempt to explain Trump’s appeal to the voters who earned him the presidency, Wagner borrowed from an allegory originally published in Infowars, the far-right outlet run by conspiracy monger—and persona non grata on Facebook and Twitter—Alex Jones. 

Here’s a relevant portion of what Wagner said, as transcribed by PennLive, a Central Pennsylvania news site:

“You’ve been on vacation for weeks. You come home and your basement is infested with raccoons. Hundreds of rabid, messy, mean raccoons have overtaken your basement.

“You want them gone immediately. You call the city. You call four different exterminators, but nobody can handle the job. But there’s this one guy and he guarantees to get rid of them, so you hire him.

“I’m not referring to Donald Trump here, but I’m referring to the raccoon guy. You don’t care if the guy smells, you don’t care if the guy swears and you don’t care if he drinks a lot and you don’t care how many time he’s been married. You don’t care if he has a plumbers crack.

“You simply want the raccoons gone. You want the problem fixed, he’s the guy, he’s the best period. That’s the raccoon guy. Here’s why we want Trump. Yeah he’s got faults and I’m not going to read exactly what’s on here, but we really don’t care. This county is mess because politicians suck.

There’s a whole lot to unpack there. 

The original Infowars article, which was attributed to an anonymous “80 year old American,” goes further in making a direct comparison to immigrants and refugees. “This country is weak, bankrupt, our enemies are making fun of us, we are being invaded by illegal aliens and bringing tens of thousands of Muslim refugees to America, while leaving Christians behind to be persecuted,” the piece states.

Wagner’s story seems to traffic in some of the derogatory rhetoric Republicans have used to describe undocumented immigrants in the past—”rats and roaches” being a prominent example, along with Trump’s infamous description of Mexicans as “vermin” who carry crime and drugs. Wagner also appeared to imply that his own long-shot candidacy was comparable to the president’s—and an exterminator’s. “You want the problem fixed, he’s the guy, he’s the best period.”

His speech quickly became fodder for Pennsylvania Democrats, including Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf. “As Election Approaches, Scott Wagner Embarrasses Himself in New (and Old) Ways,” read the headline for one email sent by Wolf’s campaign in the days after the incident. 

In a statement, Wagner refused to apologize for his remarks and denied that the “raccoons” in question were a stand-in for any type of group or person.

“The story I read last week, to me, is an analogy that illustrates voters don’t really care what types of flaws their leaders have, as long as they are getting things done for the people they serve,” the statement read in part. “The raccoons do not represent any type of person—they represent the problems.” 

Wagner has trailed Wolf by more than 10 percentage points in every major poll taken since March, but he commands the support of major Republicans, including Vice President Mike Pence, ex-White House strategist Steve Bannon, and Trump, who endorsed Wagner at a rally in August.

“He’s going to be one hell of a governor,” Trump said. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate