A Year After the Las Vegas Shooting, Gun Control Advocates Are Getting Out the Vote in Nevada

“Thoughts and prayers are not enough.”

A woman carries a "Vegas Strong" poster at the March For Our Lives event in Las Vegas, Nevada, on March 24, 2018.Damairs Carter/MediaPunch/IPX

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In Nevada, politics paused October 1.

The one-year anniversary of the deadliest mass shooting in US history began with a sunrise vigil at the Las Vegas Police Department and will end with a moment of total darkness on Las Vegas’ otherwise incessantly incandescent strip. At 10:05 p.m.—the time the gunman in a suite at the Mandalay Bay hotel opened fire—the names of the 58 lives lost will be read aloud at a memorial site a few miles from the location of the tragedy.

In keeping with the day’s contemplative tenor, those locked in bitter statewide campaigns—like Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt and Clark County Commissioner Steve Sisolak, who are vying for the state’s open governor’s seat, and Sen. Dean Heller (R) and his challenger Rep. Jacky Rosen (D)—will attend the day’s commemorative events as public officials, not candidates campaigning for votes.

A year before, the morning after the massacre at the Route 91 Music Festival, a member of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the national party arm charged with electing Democrats to the House, warned candidates and campaign staffs not to politicize the tragedy. The suffering of the survivors quickly fell out of view, and a conversation about stricter federal gun laws followed suit.

But the survivors of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas shooting in Parkland, Florida, did things differently. They have barely left the national spotlight since the February 14 tragedy—and the same goes for their attendant attention on voting out of office any lawmaker who stands with the National Rifle Association. And so, on this first anniversary in Las Vegas, attention is once more on those killed a year ago, but also on the state’s contested Senate seat and governor’s mansion, both of whose occupants have resisted stricter gun laws. In Nevada this year, the gun violence prevention movement will bring its midterm strategy to bear on another state too familiar with gun-inflicted tragedy.

That’s why October 2 will be a different story.

Giffords, the gun control organization founded by former congresswoman and mass shooting survivor Gabby Giffords (D-Ariz.), has partnered with the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and local progressive group Battle Born Progress to host a roundtable with Las Vegas shooting survivors and Democratic members of Congress. According to Giffords’ press release, the groups plan to address “America’s gun violence epidemic and the importance of supporting leaders committed to fighting for a safer future.” Later that day, Giffords and her husband, Mark Kelly, will join Democratic megadonor Tom Steyer for a get-out-the-vote kickoff at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas, an event that’s part of a joint effort with Giffords, Everytown for Gun Safety, and Steyer’s youth-focused NextGen America to register 50,000 high school students for the midterm elections.

Later this week, national gun safety groups and their Democratic allies will team up for the “NR8,” an effort pinned to the Las Vegas anniversary that aims to raise $1 million for eight congressional candidates, including Rosen, who are challenging NRA-backed Republican incumbents. 

Gun safety advocates have sought to sink Heller and Laxalt since well before the Las Vegas tragedy. In the wake of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary massacre that left 26 dead, Heller voted against the Manchin-Toomey measure to expand background checks. After the Las Vegas shooting, he once more voiced his opposition to such measures. As attorney general, Laxalt appeared in a 2016 NRA advertisement that asked Nevadans to oppose a ballot measure that would close the state’s background check loopholes. (The measure narrowly passed.) Heller and Laxalt have “A” and “A+” ratings from the NRA, respectively.

Nevada has long been host to a proxy fight between gun control and gun rights groups, and battles between those competing factions have played out between the state’s legislative and executive branches. In 2016, the major states groups representing each side spent a combined $22.5 million on the ballot measure Laxalt had opposed. Three years earlier, the Democrat-controlled Legislature tried to pass that measure, but Gov. Brian Sandoval (R) vetoed it. Gun laws in Nevada are generally lax—the state requires no permit for rifle, handgun, or shotgun purchases, and open carry is allowed.

This week’s campaign initiatives don’t mark the gun control groups’ first foray into Nevada’s races. Everytown has already spent $3.5 million to support Democratic gubernatorial candidate Sisolak, who had spearheaded the fundraising effort for Las Vegas victims. (The group has not yet announced its plans for key Senate races.) Giffords endorsed Rosen, who represents part of Las Vegas, and gave $5,000 to her campaign back in May. Rosen had been a vocal proponent for banning bump stocks, an appliance used in the shooting that turns firearms into semiautomatic weapons.

Gun control advocates had met news of the DCCC’s advice to candidates with outrage, and in the year since, it’s advice candidates and activists have increasingly ignored. Case in point: While Rosen only appeared at public anniversary commemorations as a Nevada congresswoman today, her campaign took advantage of the timing to point out federal lawmakers’ failures. “Despite the outpouring of activism and calls for reform, Congress still hasn’t taken meaningful action,” Rosen wrote in an email to supporters. “Thoughts and prayers are not enough—I’m committed to this issue, and I will continue working to pass commonsense gun safety laws that can help prevent tragedies like the one we went through.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate