Suspect Texted Story About Attempted Soros Bombing to Business Partner

A former male stripper says Cesar Sayoc had been sending him right-wing memes.

Federal authorities took Cesar Sayoc into custody on Friday, Oct. 26, 2018, and confiscated his van.Lesley Abravanel/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The last text that Justin Humberger received from Cesar Sayoc, the suspect behind the attempted bombing spree that targeted the Clintons, the Obamas, George Soros, and other Trump critics, came on Tuesday morning. Sayoc sent Humberger, who had recently become a business partner of Sayoc, a New York Times story reporting that a pipe-bomb had been delivered to Soros’ home. Humberger had no idea why Sayoc was sharing that with him.

Humberger knew Sayoc as a tour manager for a group of male strippers that once included Humberger. And this past summer, Humberger, a thirty-something Florida resident who has asked that some of his personal details be withheld, entered into a venture with Sayoc to develop a vertical farming business. “Whenever you talked to Cesar, the conversation would go to politics,” Humberger recalls. “He clearly was a strong Republican. But he was not violent.” Humberger says he was stunned to learn of Sayoc’s arrest.

Humberger first got to know Sayoc about two and a half years ago. Humberger was working as a male entertainer and was booked on two tours—each about a month long—as part of a small crew of strippers. “We’d be booked into any club where you can strip without getting arrested in that state or county,” he says. Sayoc managed the trips. The men traveled to their gigs in Sayoc’s van, which Humberger believes is the same vehicle now covered with pro-Trump and anti-Democrat messages that was seized by law enforcement officials. Humberger considered Sayoc an effective tour manager: he was punctual, organized, kept tabs on all the performers, and didn’t get wasted after the shows. 

Humberger left in the middle of the second tour, and that was the last he saw of Sayoc until a few months ago, when Sayoc called Humberger and said he wanted to get out of the entertainment business and move into a new line of work. He asked Humberger for advice on what sort of businesses he should explore. Humberger did some research and discovered that only 1 percent of agricultural companies were involved in vertical farming—that is, growing in vertical layers, perhaps within a building. “It’s farming up,” Humberger says. 

Sayoc and Humberger decided to pursue such a business together. In July, Sayoc registered a company in Florida called Ver Tech Ag. He and Humberger were each listed as a manager. They opened up a bank account. “But that’s as far as it got,” Humberger says. 

Humberger didn’t talk politics with Sayoc. He says he has little interest in politics. But Sayoc would occasionally send him texts related to politics. Several texts recently focused on the fight over Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court appointment, including one message that called Christine Blasey Ford, who accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault, a “democrat hack.” In another message, Sayoc told Humberger that if “you gonna watch anything on how democrat party became a criminal empire partnering with FBI, Hilary Clinton, Obama, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren,” he should watch a video featuring rightwing conspiracy theorist Dinesh D’souza. “You will understand,” Sayoc texted, “what has been going on Trump stops dead in its tracks cleaning up.” By this point, Humberger had a routine: he would open and close these kinds of texts from Sayoc to get rid of the notifications on his phone and not pay them attention. Consequently, he didn’t think much of the text Sayoc sent him about a bomb being found at Soros’ home. 

Humberger says that he noticed no profound change between the Sayoc he knew two and half years ago and the Sayoc with whom he tried to start a business. “I didn’t think of him as fringe or as an extreme type of guy,” he remarks. He reports that he has searched his memory and has found no clues that would explain the current moment. “I don’t have any explanation for this,” he notes. “None at all.”

Throughout Friday afternoon, Humberger was besieged by calls from reporters. But he had not yet been contacted by the FBI or law enforcement. “I just went home to wait for them,” he says. “I’m sure they’ll get around to me eventually.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate