For the First Time in Decades, Devin Nunes’ Local Paper Won’t Recommend Him

The “Fresno Bee” stings the California Republican again.

Andrew Janz, the Democratic candidate for California's 22nd DistrictThomas McKinless/ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

For more than two decades, the Fresno Bee‘s editorial board has supported Rep. Devin Nunes’ political ambitions, starting in 1996, when, at just 23 years old, he unseated a longstanding incumbent on a community college board. “Who doesn’t love a young upstart college student who is eager to get into politics and have his voice heard?” Gail Marshall, the paper’s former editorial page editor, told me earlier this year. The Bee has recommended the Central California Republican in all of his election and reelection bids ever since—until now.

On Saturday, the Bee‘s editorial board announced it is recommending Nunes’ challenger, Andrew Janz, a 34-year-old Fresno prosecutor who has been waging a high-energy campaign against the prominent ally of President Donald Trump. The Bee said Janz “offers the best chance to both lead the district by attending to its issues and then by striving for bipartisanship in Washington, D.C.” Republicans still have a strong advantage in the 22nd District, and Nunes leads in the polls. 

The Bee throwing its support behind Janz is little surprise. For nearly a year, the paper and the congressman have been trading jabs. Nunes has called the Bee a “left-wing rag” and a “propaganda machine,” accusing it of colluding with “outside groups” to attack him. For their part, the Bee‘s editorial pages have lambasted Nunes for being “Trump’s stooge,” casting the chair of the House Intelligence Committee as a once-reasonable politician who now trades in hyperpartisan conspiracy theories that are damaging to the country and his Central Valley district.

The most recent flare-up occurred late last month, when Nunes’ campaign mailed constituents a 38-page glossy magazine dedicated entirely to attacking the paper’s editorial board and its reporting. It insinuated the paper was in league with antifascist activists and had participated with Janz in political stunts meant to target Nunes. 

In response to the mailer, the Bee‘s editorial board published a blistering rebuke. “Your cherry-picked half truths, mischaracterizations and outright lies aren’t worth the glossy paper they’re printed on. No amount of donor money can buy integrity,” wrote columnist

Here’s a secret about journalists, Devin. We’re a little suspicious of everybody, regardless of political stripe. We’re not inclined to take anyone at their word. Trust but verify. When a reporter sits at the keyboard, they’re nobody’s friend.

So when you try to align us with liberal extremists or draw us as socialists with hammer and sickle flags, the punches don’t land.

The Bee didn’t dwell on its ugly battle with Nunes in its recommendation of Janz, whom it painted as a moderate Democrat who will work across party lines and serve constituents. “Janz has hitched much of his appeal to: Being accessible and accountable,” the Bee wrote. “Nunes has completely avoided town-hall meetings in Visalia, Clovis or Fresno so voters could hear him and ask questions. Janz promises to hold at least four town hall meetings a year and have mobile office hours.”

Janz sat down for an interview with the Bee‘s editorial board as it went about determining whom to support. Nunes, as has become his habit, did not respond to its requests.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate