First She Unseated a Judge Over a Sexual Assault Case. Now She’s Coming for Politicians.

“They should not be in public office, and we are going to take them out.”

Michele Landis DauberJeff Chiu/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Just imagine: A veteran judge is swept off the bench because of his role in a sexual assault controversy and a Stanford professor who would not stay quiet. After Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination hearings, that might seem like a fantasy. But back in June, Michele Dauber made it happen in California. Two years after Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky sentenced former Stanford student Brock Turner to six months in jail for sexually assaulting an unconscious woman, Dauber’s campaign to recall the judge won over voters—by a staggering 23-point margin. 

Now, the Stanford law professor who orchestrated her state’s first successful judicial recall campaign in 86 years is back, launching a super-PAC she hopes will hold lawmakers across the country accountable for their records on sexual violence. “Our perspective on the recall was that we were putting rape culture on the ballot,” Dauber says. “But all across America, rape culture is already on the ballot. We don’t even have to put it there—because there are many, many elected officials and candidates who have very discrediting records on this issue.”

The Enough is Enough Voter Project will target candidates who have been credibly accused of sexual assault, harassment, or domestic violence, as well as those who have made sexist statements or voted against bills supported by survivors. When the group launched last Monday, just six weeks from the midterm elections, Dauber had a goal of raising $250,000 to inform voters about the records of the five Republican men her group is opposing.

That includes current Minnesota Rep. Jason Lewis, who is running in a tight race against challenger Angie Craig, a Democrat endorsed by EMILY’s List. Earlier this summer, CNN exposed misogynistic comments Lewis made on a radio show in 2012, when he complained at length that he could no longer call women “sluts” and argued that “young single women” who vote based on insurance coverage for birth control pills were “without a brain” and no longer human beings. (He’s also made racist and homophobic statements.)

Dauber’s group is not just focusing on competitive races. “We need to see these individuals exit the political arena at an early stage,” she says. “Think of the amount of damage they could do as they go onto their careers.” Enough is Enough has also honed in on Steve Von Loor, a candidate for a House seat in solidly blue Durham County, North Carolina, who was accused of domestic violence by his ex-wife in 2010. (Von Loor denies the allegations.)

The group has also identified a few state legislators to go after: David Byrd of Tennessee, who is accused of sexually assaulting three teenagers he coached on a high school basketball team; Matt Rinaldi of Tennessee, who voted against a bipartisan bill to extend the statute of limitations for rape victims; and Devon Mathis of California, who was reprimanded for sexual “locker room talk” by the state Legislature and sued by multiple staffers alleging sexual misconduct or retaliation. (Both Mathis and Byrd have denied the claims against them.)

In interviews with the New York Times, multiple candidates on Enough is Enough’s list argued the new super-PAC is a Democratic operation ignoring misconduct by liberal lawmakers. But Dauber says she’s also game to take on Democrats in the 2020 primaries.

Dauber says the greatest lesson from the recall campaign against Persky was the way the issue of sexual violence energizes young female voters. “They will vote in large numbers,” she says. “They will volunteer, they will work harder than they’ve ever worked on anything before.”

Dauber has already proven herself a formidable fundraiser. With her new super-PAC, she’s working with much of the same team that worked on the recall election, including Emiliana Guereca of Women’s March Los Angeles. The group also has the backing of the Feminist Majority, a prominent women’s advocacy group. 

Dauber says she hopes her new group will become “a presence” in American politics. “These guys are wrong,” she says. “They should not be in public office, and we are going to take them out.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate