GOP Candidate Sues Pennsylvania Newspaper Over Sexual Misconduct Allegation

Marty Nothstein says he was cleared of wrongdoing.

Matt Rourke/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The fight to fill an open congressional seat in eastern Pennsylvania took another nasty turn this week when Republican candidate Marty Nothstein sued the Allentown Morning Call over the newspaper’s reporting on an allegation that Nothstein engaged in sexual misconduct nearly two decades ago.

The lawsuit accused the Morning Call of conspiring with the president of a track cycling arena in Lehigh Valley to hurt Nothstein’s chances in the congressional election by publicizing the accusation. Few details have emerged about the alleged incident, though Nothstein has vehemently denied engaging in any misconduct and says an investigation cleared him of wrongdoing.

Nothstein, a former Olympic gold medalist in track cycling, faces Democrat Susan Wild in a closely watched battle for the seat vacated this year by Republican Charlie Dent. Nothstein was placed on leave earlier this year from his position as executive director of the Valley Preferred Cycling Center—a nonprofit that runs the cycling venue just outside of Allentown—after board members at the center learned that a separate organization was investigating him for sexual misconduct. Part of the suit accuses Valley Preferred of wrongfully terminating Nothstein in February. The velodrome posted an online job listing over the summer for a new executive director. 

The Morning Call, which in August published a story about the controversy, obtained an internal email that had been sent by Andrew Ralston, then the president of Valley Preferred. In the email, Ralston said the alleged misconduct may have occurred at the cycling center around 2000, the same year Nothstein won his gold medal at the Sydney Olympics. Ralston, who is one of the defendants named in the lawsuit, reportedly denied leaking the information. “Every material aspect of this lawsuit against me is completely false. I don’t mean it ‘could be construed as false,’ I mean it’s ‘absolutely and entirely made up out of whole cloth,'” he wrote on Facebook, according to the Morning Call

Matthew Leish, an attorney for the Morning Call’s parent company, Tribune Publishing, was quoted in the paper Monday as saying, “The Morning Call strongly denies the allegations and stands by its reporting.” He added, “We will respond to the complaint in due course.” Nothstein’s campaign referred a request for comment to Nothstein’s personal attorney, Eric Hall, who did not immediately provide a comment. Wild’s campaign declined to comment.

After news of Nothstein being placed on leave became public in August, he strenuously denied any charge of wrongdoing, calling the report “100 percent false” and a “political hit job” in an interview with the Morning Call. The unspecified accusation against Nothstein was made to USA Cycling, which referred the matter to the US Center for SafeSport, an independent organization that investigates reports of bullying, harassment, and other types of abuse or misconduct within US Olympic sports. 

“An anonymous tipster planted a clearly false allegation in hopes of triggering an investigation,” he said in a statement posted to his campaign website. “Tipsters then turned around and planted a story with the media that I was under investigation. These days, that’s all it takes to smear someone.”

A week after the newspaper’s initial report, Nothstein announced that SafeSport had closed the investigation. In a press release, the campaign quoted Michael Henry, SafeSport director of investigations and outcomes, as saying, “The Center has completed its inquiry into those allegations and has determined that, based on the information and evidence currently available, the Center is not proceeding with any further proceedings at this time and the matter is now closed.”

“At this point, I am conferring with my advisors about the next step in this process. This has been a nightmare for me, for my family, and for my campaign staff and I intend to make certain that this injustice is corrected,” Nothstein said in the release.

In a statement to Mother Jones, SafeSport declined to comment, saying, “It’s the Center’s policy to not speak about specific matters.”

In its story Monday about the lawsuit, the Morning Call noted:

The lawsuit also alleges that Nothstein’s representatives offered an affidavit in which the woman at the center of the investigation denied the accusations made to SafeSport, and that the newspaper refused to review it.

The Morning Call previously stated that it declined to view the documents based on the conditions under which they were offered.

The lawsuit contends no conditions were placed on a review of the affidavit, except that the identity of the subjects remain confidential.

After retiring from cycling in 2006, Nothstein entered local politics, eventually becoming chairman of the Lehigh County Board of Commissioners. He remained involved with cycling as executive director of Valley Preferred, where, according to the biography on his campaign website, “he improved the track’s finances,” “expanded training programs for the next generation of young champions,” and “created outreach programs in underserved communities where too many children are forgotten.”

Before retiring from Congress this year, Dent represented Pennsylvania’s 15th District, a moderate conservative bastion that had sent a Republican representative to Washington for nearly two decades. After the state Supreme Court threw out the old map of the Keystone State’s congressional districts in January, the 15th District turned into the much more purple 7th District. A New York Times poll conducted late last month showed Wild leading by 8 percentage points

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate