How to Stop Hate From Fueling the Next Mass Shooting

Gun violence prevention experts describe tools to keep firearms from racist killers.

A young boy holds a sign in the Squirrel Hill section of Pittsburgh during a memorial vigil for the victims of the shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue on Saturday, Oct. 27, 2018.Gene J. Puskar/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

As news broke that eleven people had been shot dead during Sabbath services at a Pittsburgh synagogue on Saturday morning, I called Shannon Watts, the founder of the national grassroots gun violence prevention organization Moms Demand Action, who has been a leading voice on gun reform since the 2012 elementary school massacre in Newtown, Connecticut. I asked Watts what she had to say about yet another mass shooting—an exercise that’s become somewhat routine.

Instead of answering my question, Watts wanted to talk about a shooting that hadn’t even taken place: She told me the story of a mother who reported a white man to police after he sent her a private Facebook message that said he hoped her “black children get hung.” The man, it turns out, had been scheming to conduct a school shooting against two Kentucky school districts.

Watts brought this up, of course, to illustrate the tragic trend of shootings targeting minority communities that has played out in America this week. The attack on the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh—when the shooter reportedly entered the building yelling “All Jews must die!”—comes just days after a white man killed two black patrons of a Kroger grocery store near Louisville, Kentucky. That incident, like the Pittsburgh massacre, is being investigated by the FBI as a potential hate crime, a category of criminal act strongly associated with America’s epidemic of mass shootings.

“People are fed up with the hateful violence in this country, and the gun violence that is plaguing it,” Watts told me. “If you look at all the tentacles that contribute to these heinous acts, easy access to arsenals and bulk ammunition plays a major role.”

A shooter who maintained white nationalist sympathies killed nine people in a Charleston, South Carolina, church basement in 2015. A year later, a gunman opened fire at Orlando’s Pulse nightclub in 2016, leaving 102 mostly brown, mostly gay victims.

There isn’t a lot of data on how much gun violence is motivated by hate. According to an analysis of FBI crime statistics by Everytown for Gun Safety, more than 10,000 hate crimes each year—20 percent of which are religiously motivated—involve a firearm. This could be an undercount: A 2017 report from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence estimates two-thirds of hate crimes are never reported, perhaps because historically marginalized victims may not be comfortable reporting to law enforcement. However many there are, it seems there are more and more: A 2018 report from the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University at San Bernardino found that hate crimes increased by 12 percent in the nation’s 10 largest cities over the course of 2017. 

Gun violence prevention experts say there are concrete measures that can be taken to keep firearms out of the hands of racist or hate-based killers. While six states have banned people with hate crime convictions from purchasing guns, federally-mandated background checks do not currently flag whether the would-be gun owner has been charged or convicted of one. “It’s a gaping hole in our gun laws,” according to Avery Gardiner, the co-president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “People we know hate other people based on immutable characteristics are pretty dangerous.” 

Gardner also noted that “red flag” laws—which keep guns out of the hands of those who pose a risk to themselves or others—could be used to disarm someone in likely to commit a hate crime. Judges already charged with making such decisions could consider if someone with access to guns was liable “to act on bigotry.” A federal red flag law has been pending in Congress since the Parkland shooting, but it, like all other federal gun violence legislation, has languished without a vote. (More than 10 states have passed red flag laws in recent years.) 

Before departing for campaign events in the Midwest, President Donald Trump told reporters that gun laws had “very little to do” with the attack on Tree of Life, and suggested that the shooter, who shot four police officers, might have been stopped by an armed guard.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate