Heitkamp Apologizes for Outing, Misidentifying Sexual Violence Victims

“I deeply regret this mistake.”

Tom Williams/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), who is locked in a heated reelection race with Republican Rep. Kevin Cramer, ran a campaign ad in several North Dakota newspapers Sunday that listed the names of numerous women that the ad described as survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and rape. But it turns out that some of those listed had not given the campaign permission to identify them publicly, while others say they are not, in fact, survivors of sexual violence. Now, Heitkamp is apologizing.

The ad, which was styled as an “Open Letter to Congressman Cramer” and supposedly signed by more than 125 survivors, blasted Cramer’s recent criticism of the #MeToo movement and the sexual assault allegations against Brett Kavanaugh. In an interview last week, Cramer said that #MeToo is a “movement toward victimization,” adding that his female relatives didn’t understand #MeToo because they are “pioneers of the prairieā€¦tough people.”

Heitkamp’s newspaper ad made the case that survivors, especially those who are Native women and girls, are “prairie tough” when they decide to speak out about sexual violence despite the pressure to remain silent. “We are here to let you know that we have all suffered from domestic violence, sexual assault, or rapeā€”and that yes, we expect somebody to believe us when we say it,” the ad said. “Because it happened.”

But Lexi Zhorela, a 24-year-old hairdresser from Bismarck who learned of the ad on Monday night, told the Associated Press that she had shared her experience of sexual assault in confidence with a few friends. One of them tagged her in a Facebook post, apparently resulting in her inclusion on the list, she believed. “I have only shared my story with a couple of people in confidence,” Zhorela said. “I didnā€™t want it blasted for the world to see.” Meanwhile, conservative commentator Rob Port, of the North Dakota politics blog SayAnythingBlog.com, identified at least four women who said they did not give permission for their names to be posted or who were not survivors of sexual violence.

Heitkamp apologized for the ad on Tuesday. In a statement, she explained that her campaign had produced the ad with the help of victim advocates, and that “several of the [women whose names] were provided to us” did not give their permission for their names to be shared, or were not survivors of abuse. “I deeply regret this mistake and we are in the process of issuing a retraction, personally apologizing to each of the people impacted by this and taking the necessary steps to ensure this never happens again,” Heitkamp said.

ā€œAll I can say is at the end of the day when I put my head on the pillow I know that I caused hurtā€¦this was incompetent. This was wrong,ā€ Heitkamp added during an appearance Tuesday on Port’s radio show. ā€œThis should have never happened.ā€

Cramerā€”who has been extensively criticized for his recent comments on sexual violenceā€”told the AP that the ad was a “revictimization” of survivors. “This is what happens when desperate people do things for their own personal political gain,” he said.

Heitkamp had been cheered as a champion for survivors after voting against Kavanaugh’s confirmation, despite intense political pressure to support him. Donations to her campaign spiked after she announced her “no” vote, though she had been losing ground to Cramer in the polls even before her Kavanaugh decision.

After learning of the ad, Zhorela decided she would no longer vote for Heitkamp, she told the AP. It remains to be seen whether other survivors follow suit.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate