What Lisa Murkowski’s Vote on Kavanaugh Means to Sexual Assault Survivors in Alaska

“We’re organizing the rage of women.”

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

With the Senate’s vote on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh approaching, all eyes are once again on a small group of undecided senators, including Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski. It’s familiar territory for the moderate Republican, who last year faced backlash for bucking her party on the attempted repeal of the Affordable Care Act. 

But as advocates on both sides of the nomination battle turn up the heat, the sexual misconduct allegations against Kavanaugh have brought an extra level of pressure from Murkowski’s constituents in Alaska, which has the nation’s highest rates of reported rape and where a recent court decision has mobilized local survivors—including the Alaska Native women hardest hit by the state’s sexual assault epidemic.

In August 2017, Justin Schneider, a 34-year-old air traffic controller, offered to drive a 25-year-old Alaska Native woman at a gas station to her boyfriend’s house, according to the Anchorage Daily News. Instead, he drove her to a dark street, choked her until she passed out, and ejaculated on her. The woman believed “she was going to die,” a detective on the case noted in an affidavit. Prosecutors offered Schneider a deal: Plead guilty to a single charge of second-degree assault and receive a two-year prison sentence—one year already served under house arrest, and the second year suspended as he completes the terms of his probation.

Anchorage Superior Court Judge Michael Corey approved that deal last month during a widely criticized sentencing hearing during which Schneider never expressed remorse or noted the impact the crime had on his victim, KTVA reported. He walked out free, subject only to three years’ probation and sex-offender treatment.

The case has had a devastating impact on local survivors, says Jennifer Brown, development manager for Standing Together Against Rape, an Anchorage rape crisis center. Brown says her organization has received an uptick in hotline calls in recent weeks, with the outcome of the Schneider case landing at the same time as the multiple sexual assault allegations against Kavanaugh. “A lot of [the calls] are related to people being triggered,” Brown says. “Our volunteer responders have done a lot of work with folks about self-care. But you almost can’t avoid the news. It’s everywhere.”

Elizabeth Williams, an Anchorage-based social worker who is now mounting a campaign to get Alaskans to vote “no” on Judge Corey’s retention election in November, says recent news has motivated hundreds of supporters to endorse her effort online or donate money to unseat the judge. “We’ve got this backdrop of just the rage of women, that I think we’ve always had,” she says. “But we’re channeling it. We’re organizing the rage of women. This is just a local way of doing that.” 

Since launching her campaign, Williams says she has received hundreds of Facebook messages from Alaska Native women with stories about being strangled or sexually assaulted. Many of the women shared the reasons why they didn’t report—often because they felt their safety as Alaska Native women wasn’t taken seriously, or that they wouldn’t be believed, or that they would be stereotyped as unreliable or poor witnesses. “They’re upset by the sentence, but they’re not surprised,” says Williams, who is white. “You can’t ignore race in this. I strongly believe that if I had been the victim, that man would have walked away with years in jail.”

Adeline Raboth, a survivor from Fairbanks, made much the same point at press conference protesting Kavanaugh outside Murkowski’s Washington, DC, offices last week. “Being raised in the Alaskan Native community in my age group, I’m in my 70s, we were taught not to tell about sexual assault,” Raboth said, according to Rewire News. “Most of the time, we would be blamed for being provocative in some way.”

According to FBI statistics, 116.7 rapes per 100,000 residents are reported to authorities in Alaska—65 percent more than in the next highest state (actual numbers are almost certainly far higher, given the vast underreporting of sexual violence to police). A recent report from the state’s Department of Public Safety revealed that 42 percent of felony sex offense victims in 2017 were Alaska Native women, mostly around Anchorage and in the state’s isolated western reaches. Nationally, more than four in five American Indian or Alaska Native women have experienced sexual assault, intimate partner violence, stalking, or psychological aggression at some point in their lives; one in three endured at least one of these forms of violence in the past year, according to a 2016 study.

None of this should be news to Murkowski. As one of the Senate’s few pro-choice Republicans, she has a reputation as an advocate for women’s issues, and according to the Brookings Institution, she introduced two bills this summer designed to increase survivors’ access to critical care and fight human trafficking in Native communities.

What’s more, Alaska Natives’ opposition to Kavanaugh was established even before the sexual assault allegations came to light. Tribal and legal officials pointed to Kavanaugh’s potential to decimate federal protections for subsistence fishing rights, voting rights, and climate change regulations. State lawmakers representing tribal and rural interests criticized his record on access to health care. And Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) drew attention to past writings in which Kavanaugh argued that Native Hawaiians might not qualify for constitutional protections as Native Americans—leading the Alaska Federation of Natives, which represents about 20 percent of the state’s population, to come out powerfully against him.

But following the allegations, tribal leaders added their voices in support of Kavanaugh’s accusers, citing their experience with dealing with sexual violence in their own communities. “Violence against our Native women and children in Alaska is not part of our culture, but is unfortunately an epidemic,” wrote the Bering Sea Elders Group, which comprises representatives of 39 tribes from Western Alaska, in a resolution against Kavanaugh soon after Christine Blasey Ford’s name and story were revealed. “It is our way to value every individual and their words, and a woman’s word is evidence.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate