A Republican Candidate Said He’d “Stomp” His Liberal Opponent. It Wasn’t His First Bizarre Threat.

There was that one involving “bloody gloves.”

Bastiaan Slabbers/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A battle for the governor’s seat in one of the country’s perennial swing states focused on violence and mental stability this week amid the fallout from Republican Scott Wagner’s promise to “stomp all over” his opponent’s face with “golf spikes.” 

Wagner, who is the founder of a waste management business and represented part of York County in the statehouse, has trailed incumbent Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf by double digits in every major poll. He made the bizarre threat during a live video on his campaign’s Facebook page on October 12. Hours later, Wagner walked the statements back and removed the original video. “I may have chosen a poor metaphor,” he said in video tweeted out on his official account. “I shouldn’t have said what I said.” 

Three days later, Wolf’s campaign fired back with an online ad that calls Wagner “unhinged” and features other instances where he has made similar threats of violence. 

Among the incidents highlighted in the ad:

  • During a meeting in August 2014 with the York 912 Patriots, who call themselves “a non-partisan group of patriots committed to the Constitution of the United States,” Wagner—then a state senator—donned latex gloves and said, “The next six months in Harrisburg, with me up there in leadership, are gonna get a little bloody. So, you know what, I’m not getting blood on my hands.” 
  • Before entering politics in 2014, Wagner made a strange analogy during an appearance on Behind the Headlines, a local news program, while discussing the effect of strict regulations on his waste management business. “If I would take my hands and I were to wrap them around your neck and start choking you, what would happen?” he asked the host. “We discussed briefly that you would turn the color of your shirt and then within another minute you’d turn darker like your sport coat. And then you would eventually just hit the ground. Well, we’re being choked in business.”
  • Recently, while addressing the York County Estate Planning Council in May 2017, Wagner noticed a man filming him. The cameraman admitted to working as an opposition researcher for American Bridge 21st Century, a progressive super PAC founded by liberal political consultant David Brock, according to a writeup in the York Daily Record.  Wagner yanked the camera from the staffer and accused him of trespassing. “Could I please have my camera?” the researcher asked Wagner at one point while continuing to film him on a cell phone. “You’re stealing from me.” Spring Garden Township police were called to the event and the state attorney general’s office opened an investigation into the incident, but no charges ended up being filed

Wagner, whose campaign website trumpets his “straight talkin'” style, has been criticized before for some controversial rhetorical choices. Last month, on the campaign trail, he recounted an extended analogy—originally cribbed from Infowars—that in part compared undocumented immigrants to “rabid, messy, mean raccoons” that “have overtaken your basement.” As a businessman-turned-politician with a populist tone, Wagner has drawn frequent comparisons to Trump and, in August, received the president’s support at a Keystone State rally. 

The original threat to “stomp all over” Wolf’s face received wide bipartisan condemnation last week, including a reprimand from House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.), who had previously accused Democrats of working to “incite even more harassment and violence.” (During a practice last year for the annual Congressional Baseball Game, Scalise was shot by a former volunteer for Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign.)

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate