“Anti-Semitic and Offensive”: Jewish Watchdog Group Slams GOP Rep. Steve King

“Silence in the face of anti-Semitism and hate is acquiescence. It is to enable it.”

Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Anti-Defamation League, a 115-year-old civil rights organization dedicated to fighting anti-Semitism, called on Speaker of the House Paul Ryan to strip Rep. Steve King (R-IA) of his chairmanships and formally censure him, according to a letter obtained by Mother Jones

“We write to call to your attention an extraordinarily disturbing series of involvements and statements by Representative Steve King that are anti-Semitic and offensive not just to the Jewish community, but to all Americans,” wrote Jonathan Greenblatt, the ADL’s chief executive. 

King, an eight-term congressman from northwest Iowa, has repeatedly amplified the fringe voices of white nationalists on Twitter, used racist language to describe immigrants, and cozied up with Nazi sympathizers. On Tuesday, even Rep. Steve Stivers (R-Ohio), who leads the GOP’s midterm electioneering effort, condemned King’s “recent comments, actions, and retweets” as “completely inappropriate.” 

A spokesperson for Ryan was not immediately available to comment. 

Greenblatt said the massacre at Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, where 11 people were killed in the worst anti-Semitic attack in American history, reminded him “that silence in the face of anti-Semitism and hate is acquiescence. It is to enable it.” King is a member of the House’s Agriculture, Small Business, and Judiciary committees. He is chairman of the latter’s Subcommittee on the Constitution & Civil Justice. 

In recent weeks, the congressman has drawn particularly strong criticism for endorsing a white nationalist candidate for Toronto mayor and meeting with members of an Austrian far-right party during an overseas trip. In his letter, Greenblatt noted that Austria’s Jewish community “boycotts the party in its entirety” due to a troubling history of anti-Semitism. In one instance, a party leader in the city of Imst posted a flyer with Hitler’s image and the caption, “Adolf, Germany needs you.”

While in Vienna, King was interviewed by Unzensuriert, a news outlet HuffPost called a “far-right propaganda site,” where he said Muslims and liberals “have teamed up against Western civilization.” As my colleague Sophie Murguia reported at the time:

King seemed to agree with the interviewer when she brought up a racist conspiracy theory called the “Great Replacement,” which holds that European civilization is being wiped out by nonwhite migrants. “The US subtracts from its population a million of our babies in the form of abortion,” King said. “We add to our population approximately 1.8 million of ‘somebody else’s babies’ who are raised in another culture before they get to us. We are replacing our American culture 2 to 1 every year.”

King attributed the “Great Replacement” to George Soros, a Jewish philanthropist who has become a bogeyman on the right for his widespread donations to progressive causes. Soros, who some right-wing commentators have falsely blamed in recent days for funding the migrant caravan heading to the US-Mexican border, was one of the intended recipients of pipe bombs sent last week by Cesar Sayoc, an avowed Trump supporter who shared far-right conspiracy theories online. Sayoc and Robert Bowers, the gunman in the Tree of Life shooting, both displayed a deep animus toward Soros on social media.

King has denounced the bombing attempt, and denied that his criticism of Soros is anti-Semitic. But he has refused to tone down his rhetoric. “His money floats in in such a way you can’t see the flow,” King told the Washington Post, “but if you trace it back, you can connect it to his foundation.” 

“Me pointing out the activities of George Soros is a matter of pointing out the facts, and there is no reason to refrain from the real truth,” King went on to say. “I don’t think about George Soros as a Jew. I think about him as an operator, a leftist operator that’s been engaged in upsetting freedom and [being] more or less an enemy of conservatism.”

Back home in Iowa, King is in a close race against Democrat J.D. Scholten. As of Wednesday, polling aggregator FiveThirtyEight gave King a 51.1 percent chance of keeping his seat. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate