Corporations Are Pulling Their Support From Steve King. These Outfits Are Doubling Down.

As pressure builds to disavow the controversial Republican, these two corporate PACs chipped in toward his tight reelection race.

Tom Williams/Congressional Quarterly/Newscom/ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Iowa Republican Steve King has been making liberal jaws drop for years with his inflammatory rhetoric on immigration and race, but that has never stopped corporate PACs from supporting him. However, following revelations of a recent meeting between King and a group of far-right Austrians linked to neo-Nazisā€”a meeting that occurred during a European trip funded by a Holocaust remembrance group, during which the congressman visited the Auschwitz concentration campā€”Iowa Jewish groups and even some of his Republican colleagues are saying King has gone too far. And now, he is experiencing the cruelest backlash for a politician, which some of his corporate backers saying they’re done with him.

But not all.

On Monday, as companies such as Land O’ Lakes and Intel said they could no longer support King because of his history of racist remarks, the National Beer Wholesalers Association PAC and Black Hills Corporate PAC each wrote checks to the King campaign. 

Over his career, King has raised more than $2.9 million from PAC donationsā€”more than a quarter of his career fundraising totals. Some of those PACs were ideologically driven, but many belonged to corporate or trade groups; over the years, PACs for the American Bankers Association, AT&T, and the National Association of Home Builders have topped his list of supporters. So far this year, King has picked up more than $150,000 in PAC donations, including donations from AT&T ($5,000), Koch Industries ($10,000), and Berkshire Hathaway ($2,500). 

Over the weekend, following the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting and as details of King’s recent European trip filtered out, pressure began growing for some of King’s corporate backers to disown him. King has not had a stellar fundraising year to begin withā€”so far, he’s raised just $741,000, far below the average for incumbents and almost exactly $1 million less than what his Democratic opponent has raised. King is a long-term incumbent in a heavily Republican rural district, so the fundraising disadvantage may not matter, but the most recent poll numbers show a close race.

So far, three of his corporate PAC donors have disavowed him: Purina, Intel, and Land O’ Lakes. And his opponent, J.D. Scholten, is continuing to fundraise at a blistering pace, so momentum would not appear to be on King’s side. 

But the reality is the disavowals were largely symbolic. Of the three, Land O’ Lakes is the most significant, though its PAC has contributed just $2,500 this election. Meanwhile, Intel’s PAC donated $2,000, and Purina chipped in just $500. 

But the pressure campaign clearly isn’t spooking some of King’s other corporate and trade group backers. In a filing Monday, his campaign reported receiving contributions from Black Hills Corporate PAC ($1,000) and the National Beer Wholesalers Association PAC ($1,500). A request for comment from the beer distributors trade group was not returned. Update: A spokeswoman for Black Hills, a South Dakota power company, acknowledged the company’s PAC had donated by said it “will no longer do so because of recent statements which conflict with our company values.” Both the NBWA and Black Hills PACs have donated to King’s campaign previously, with the National Beer Wholesalers Association PAC giving him $53,000 during the course of his career. 

None of King’s biggest corporate or trade group backers have pulled back either. Neither the American Bankers Association, which has given King $77,500 over the course of his career and $9,000 this election, nor AT&T, which has given King $59,000 in his career and $5,000 so far this election, have said they would cut King off. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate