The Justice Department Indicts Seven Russian Intelligence Officers for Cyberattacks

Three of them were previously charged by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Justice Department on Thursday brought criminal charges against seven officers of Russia’s military intelligence directorate, known as the GRU, for computer hacking, wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and money laundering. The charges were unveiled shortly after the British and Dutch governments accused the GRU of directing a series of cyberattacks on European targets. 

According to Justice Department officials, the GRU officers hacked anti-doping agencies in the US and around the globe seeking to steal and publish the private medical information of hundreds of athletes, an act of retaliation for Russia’s ban from the 2018 Olympic games over doping by many of the country’s athletes. The DOJ also alleged that the officers targeted Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a nuclear energy company in Pennsylvania; the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), an intergovernmental group that polices the use of chemical weapons and which has been probing the March 2018 poisoning of former Russian intelligence officer Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury, England; and a Swiss lab that analyzed the deadly nerve agent used in the attack on the Skripals. 

Three of the GRU officers charged on Thursdayā€”Artem Malyshev, Dmitry Badin, and Ivan Yermakovā€”were previously indicted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller in July for their role interfering in the 2016 election. According to Justice Department officials, the new indictments, though not technically part of Mueller’s probe, point to similar efforts by Russia to sow chaos through hacking and disinformation campaigns. 

In a press conference at the Hague earlier on Thursday, Dutch officials described how they had apprehended and expelled four GRU officers after they launched a cyberattack on the OPCW this spring. The British Foreign Office on Thursday accused the GRU of “indiscriminate and reckless” cyberattacks  against various political, financial, and media institutions in the UK, US, Russia, Ukraine, and more.

The Kremlin has responded to the hacking allegations by denouncing the claims without clearly denying them. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova called the UK claims a “diabolical blend of perfume”ā€”a reference to the fake bottle of Nina Ricci perfume used by suspected Russian agents to transport the deadly nerve agent Novichok to the UK for use in poisoning the Skripals.

“They mixed everything up in one bottle, which could be a bottle of Nina Ricci perfume: GRU, cyber spies, Kremlin hackers, and the [World Anti-Doping Agency],” Zakharova said at a press briefing Thursday.

This summer, Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicted 12 GRU officers, accusing them of a participating in a plot to steal and distribute emails from Democratic targets as part of an effort to help Donald Trump’s campaign. Russia and the United States do not have an extradition treaty, and there is little chance the officers in either case will be extradited to the United States in the near future.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate