Antonio Delgado Overcomes Racist Ads Portraying Him as a “Big-City Rapper” to Win House Seat

“His voice definitely can’t be my voice,” a white woman said in one attack ad. Voters felt differently.

Antonio DelgadoSeth Wenig/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

As a Rhodes Scholar, Antonio Delgado studied philosophy and political theory. But when he ran for Congress in upstate New York this year, Republicans chose to highlight another part of Delgado’s resume: his post-Oxford, post-Harvard Law years as a rapper. The ads portrayed Delgado, who worked as a corporate lawyer at an elite firm before running for Congress, as a “big-city rapper” unsuited to represent an overwhelmingly white district.

On Tuesday, Delgado defeated Rep. John Faso and will become the first nonwhite representative in the district’s history. The racist ads Delgado overcame were not subtle, even by the standards of the Trump era. One ad from the National Republican Congressional Committee opened with a white man saying, “Antonio Delgado would be fine in Los Angeles, maybe New York City,” and then adding, “Nobody talks like that around here.” It ended with a woman claiming, “His voice definitely can’t be my voice.” Another NRCC ad took Delgado’s rapping out of context and juxtaposed images of him in a suit with a shadowy album-cover photo of him in a hoodie.

Delgado was one of many Democrats of color cast as an outsider in swing districts held by white incumbents. Indicted Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) falsely suggested that his Palestinian-Mexican-American opponent, Ammar Campa-Najjar, was a “radical Muslim” with plans to infiltrate Congress. (Campa-Najjar is Christian.) Republicans tried to boost New Jersey Rep. Tom MacArthur against challenger Andy Kim, who is Korean American, by sending out a mailer that used a stereotypically Asian font to claim there was something “Real Fishy about Andy Kim.” In Ohio, the Congressional Leadership Fund, a super-PAC affiliated with outgoing House Speaker Paul Ryan, falsely implied that Aftab Pureval, the son of Indian and Tibetan immigrants, helped Libya pay less money to the relatives of Americans killed by state-sanctioned terrorism.

In Delgado’s race, Republicans appeared determined to motivate the white voters who delivered New York’s 19th Congressional District to Donald Trump. About 83 percent of voters in the Hudson Valley district, which covers an area nearly the size of New Jersey, are white. Barack Obama carried the district by eight points in 2008 and six points and 2012 before Trump won by a six-point margin.

Contrary to the NRCC’s big-city insinuations, Delgado grew up north of the district in Schenectady, New York. After the 2016 election, he moved from North Jersey to Rhinebeck, near his wife’s hometown of Woodstock. (Faso grew up outside the district on Long Island and went to high school in Queens.) In college, Delgado became the first Colgate University student since 1971 to win a Rhodes Scholarship and headed off to Oxford with plans to teach philosophy to college students. But he focused on hip-hop after graduating from Harvard Law School, which he felt had the potential to serve as an “informal educational system,” like churches during the civil rights era.

The Hip Hop Cosign, a now-defunct blog, wrote in 2007 that Delgado’s debut (and only) album as the rapper AD the Voice was “rooted in black intellectual excellence and the human struggle for peace and truth.” Delgado rapped in one song, “My patriotism a given…Don’t tell me I don’t love my country because I stay driven by a desire for us to be better.”

Republicans portrayed Delgado’s brief rap career differently. One ad from the Congressional Leadership Fund paired Delgado rapping “God bless Iraq” with an image of the Twin Towers burning. Delgado actually said, “We must fight with love and goodness in our hearts and peace in our minds if democracy, equality, and freedom are truly to prevail. God bless America, God bless Iraq, God bless us all.” (The ads did not mention that Delgado went on to become a lawyer in the New York office of Akin Gump, a lobbying powerhouse based in Washington, DC.)

As my colleague Tim Murphy wrote in September,  Republicans’ message was not lost on the voter who made this sign:

Faso called Delgado’s lyrics “offensive” but said he had no control over ads from outside groups. The New York Times editorial board wrote that Faso was “race-baiting his opponent” and counting on his constituents “to be bigots.” Faso responded that it was “nothing less than an outrageous smear.”

Delgado said the attacks were an attempt to “otherize” him and avoid talking about the issues. His own ads avoided the controversy by focusing on providing affordable universal health care and cutting taxes for the middle class.

But Delgado did not apologize for his lyrics, either. “I’m very committed to the themes that I was concerned about then, chief among them people on the margins,” he said last month. “So for me to apologize, I would in essence be apologizing for what I am doing today.”

As the results come in, we want to hear from you. How are you reacting? Do you have a message for the winner? Let us know by filling out the form below, send us an email at talk@motherjones.com, or leave us a voicemail at (510) 519-MOJO. We may use some of your responses in a follow-up story.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate