There Was a Blue Wave in District Attorney Races Too

They are all determined to “make our criminal justice system better”

AVNphotolab/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

As the criminal justice reforms from the 1990s, which many have suggested led to the overcrowding of prisons and jails across the country, lose their popularity, district attorneys who want to try new, progressive methods that can offer rehabilitation instead of punishment are winning races. On the state-level, a number of reformers have won some competitive races for district attorney, and they will be joining reformers like Larry Krasner in Philadelphia and Kimberly Foxx in Chicago, in bringing progressive policies to their districts.

In Bexar County, Texas, which is home to San Antonio, Democrat Joe Gonzales handily beat his Republican opponent to replace Nico LaHood, the controversial Democrat he beat in the primary. LaHood was one of the country’s most notorious district attorneys. In his first term, he used his office to “to promote his anti-vaccination views, float Islamophobic conspiracy theories, and threaten to ruin his critics’ livelihoods,” Mother Jones reported

One of Gonzales’ signature issues during the campaign was cash bail, which he promised to end for certain low-level offenses. In Bexar County, as in many places in the United States, local jails often require individuals arrested for a crime but not convicted, to post a certain bail amount before they can be released. For poor people, this can often mean the difference between going home or spending an indefinite time behind bars simply because they can’t afford to get out. 

Elsewhere in Texas, John Creuzot defeated Republican Faith Johnson to become to district attorney of Dallas County. Johnson, the first black woman to lead the DA’s office in Dallas, was appointed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott in 2016 when former DA Susan Hawk resigned suddenly for mental health reasons.

And while Creuzot wasn’t the first choice for criminal justice reformers in Dallas, his platform rang more progressive than Johnson’s, who claimed to be “tough-on-crime” even as that rhetoric falls out of fashion. Creuzot, however, focused on chipping away at the swelling prison population in Texas. He has pledged to reform cash bail so poor people aren’t stuck in jai and assured voters that he will not prosecute non-violent crimes associated with homelessness or pursue charges against people for first-time, low-level marijuana possession.

History was made in Massachusetts with the election of Rachael Rollins, the new district attorney of Suffolk County which is home to Boston. Before running for DA, Rollins was an assistant in the US Attorneys Office in Massachusetts prosecuting and defending a variety of cases from sexual violence to gun trafficking. She handily won her election in a night that was full of firsts for women and people of color across the county. Rollins defeated Independent Michael Maloney with 80 percent of the vote to become the first woman of color to hold the post of top prosecutor in the state of Massachusetts. 

In the September primary, she won a crowded field after campaigning on revamping Boston’s criminal justice system, which, as Mother Jones previously reported, has some of the largest racial disparities in the criminal justice system in the country: 

In Boston, while black people make up a quarter of the total population, they accounted for nearly 70 percent of individuals who were observed, questioned, or searched by the police in 2016. They are disproportionately charged, jailed, and denied bail. And crimes perpetrated against them aren’t investigated with the same rigor: The killing of a white person there is more than twice as likely to end with an arrest than the killing of a black person—a gap that’s unparalleled in other major cities, according to a Washington Post investigation

Now that she’s won, Rollins can begin implementing her new proposals in Suffolk County such as bringing in outside prosecutors to handle cases police officers, who often work closely with DAs, are accused of misconduct and reducing the number of people behind bars by declining to pursue charges for low-level offenders and prioritizing treatment for individuals struggling with mental illness and addiction. In a statement after her win, Rollins, summed up the theme of the night among progressive district attorney-elects saying she was going to work to “make our criminal justice system better.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate