Cindy Hyde-Smith Finally Apologizes for “Public Hanging” Comment

Then she accused her opponent of “twisting” her flippant remark into a “political weapon.” 

Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith answers a question during a televised Mississippi US Senate debate with Democrat Mike Espy in Jackson, Mississippi, on November 20.Rogelio V. Solis/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Mississippi Republican Senate candidate Cindy Hyde-Smith apologized during a debate tonight for her “public hanging” remark at a rally in Tupelo nine days ago. The remark sparked fierce public criticism that only increased when she refused to back down, saying repeatedly, “We put out a statement and we stand by that statement.” 

In a rambling explanation, she initially attempted to frame her controversial remarks—in which she said that if a local cattle rancher “invited me to a public hanging, I’d be on the front row”—as a mere metaphor. It was no more literal, she argued, than when she said she would stick her hand in a circle saw for that same supporter, who lost his parents when he was in high school. It didn’t mean she would physically put her hand in a circle saw.

Finally, she concluded, “For anyone that was offended by my comments, I certainly apologize.”

Mississippi has a gruesome history of lynching—from 1882 to 1968, 581 people were lynched there, more than in any other state, according to the NAACP. Hyde-Smith’s Democratic opponent, Mike Espy, is black, as are 40 percent of the state’s residents.

After her apology, Hyde-Smith accused her opponent of “twisting” her flippant comment into a “political weapon.” 

“That is just wrong, it is unfortunate, and that’s the type of politics Mississippians are tired of,” she said.

“No one twisted your comments because your comments were live,” Espy retorted. “I don’t know what’s in your heart, but we all know what came out of your mouth.”

This was not the only controversial remark Hyde-Smith has made during the campaign. While in Starkville, where Mississippi State University is based, she said it might be “a great idea” to make it “just a little more difficult” for “liberal folks in those other schools” to vote. Espy asserted that Hyde-Smith had played into a damaging “stereotype” of Southerners, echoing an ad his campaign released hours before the debate. 

Espy clearly recognized the opportunity in attacking Hyde-Smith over the statement that has garnered national attention. The Democratic candidate, who is best known for his work as secretary of agriculture in the Clinton administration, was asked about what he expected his availability to his potential constituents would be. He emphasized the importance of a free press and communication between politicians and the media, and returned to criticizing Hyde-Smith for refusing to answer questions about the “public hanging” comment at a press conference “six times.” 

In his closing statement, Espy once more brought up the “public hanging” comment, as well as Hyde-Smith’s description of voter suppression as “a great idea.”

“Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith made thoughtless comments that harmed our state, hurt our jobs, and hurt our economy—you got companies like Walmart, who today said that her comments did not reflect the values of their company, and they do not reflect the values of our state,” Espy said. “And we got a senator here talking about public hangings and talking about voter suppression. Ladies and gentlemen, I’m not going back to yesteryear, we are gonna move forward.”

This was the only debate between the two candidates, who are vying to fill the seat vacated by Thad Cochran last year. Gov. Phil Bryant appointed Hyde-Smith to fill the vacancy in March. The final vote will take place November 27. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate