Cindy Hyde-Smith Refuses to Apologize for “Public Hanging” Comment

“We put out a statement yesterday.”

Republican U.S. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississippi, right, leaves a news conference Monday, Nov. 12, 2018, at the state Republican Party headquarters in Jackson, Miss.Emily Wagster Pettus/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississippiā€”who is facing a runoff to keep the seat she was appointed to earlier this yearā€”is refusing to apologize for saying that if a local cattle rancher “invited me to a public hanging, Iā€™d be on the front row.”

The comment, which was caught on camera by journalist and blogger Lamar White, Jr., during a campaign stop in Tupelo, has sparked an intense backlash. Mississippi has a gruesome history of lynchingā€”from 1882 to 1968, 581 people were lynched there, more than in any other state. Hyde-Smith’s Democratic opponent, Mike Espy, is black, as are 40 percent of the state’s residents.

On Sunday night, Hyde-Smith released the following statement: “In a comment on Nov. 2, I referred to accepting an invitation to a speaking engagement. In referencing the one who invited me, I used an exaggerated expression of regard, and any attempt to turn this into a negative connotation is ridiculous.”

Not exactly an apology. 

On Monday, Hyde-Smith was repeatedly asked about the controversy at a press conference she held with Republican Gov. Phil Bryant to announce an endorsement Hyde-Smith had received from the anti-abortion National Right to Life Committee. She still refused to apologize. “We put out a statement yesterday, and we stand by that statement,” she said.

Asked to expand on what she meant by a “public hanging,” Hyde-Smith said, “We put out the statement yesterday, and it’s available, and we stand by that statement.”

“Senator, are you familiar with Mississippi’s history of lynchings?” another reporter asked.

“I put out a statement yesterday,” Hyde-Smith responded. “And that’s all I’m gonna say about it.”

Asked how her comments could have anything other than a “negative connotation,” Hyde-Smith said, “I put out a statement yesterday, and we stand by the statement, and that’s all I’m going to say about it.”

“Is that phrasing in your every-day lingo?” a reporter asked.

“I put out a statement yesterday,” she said. “We stand by the statement.”

Then, the question was put to Bryant, who had originally appointed Hyde-Smith to the seat.

“She is certainly addressing the fact that she has put out a statement,” he noted.

“I can tell you all of us in public life have said things on occasion that we could have phrased better,” Bryant added. “But I know this woman, and I know her heart. I knew it when I appointed her. I know it now. She meant no offense by that statement. There was nothing in her heart of ill will.”

Hyde-Smith silently nodded beside him. 

Bryant wasn’t done, though.

“Absolutely we have been sensitive to race relations in this state,” he said, before complaining that prominent black leaders had refused to join President Donald Trump at the grand opening of a pair of museums in Jackson, Mississippi, dedicated to the state’s history in the Civil Rights Movement. “I brought the president of the United States here to open the civil rights museum, and African-American leadership, they would fail to even come to the event, because the president of the United States was there.”

With that, Bryant sought to tie the controversy to the issue they’d come to the press conference to discuss. Bryant, who has said his goal is to end abortion in Mississippi, declared that abortion is a “genocide of over 20 million African-American children.”

“See, in my heart, I am confused about where the outrage is at about 20 million African-American children that have been aborted,” he said. “No one wants to say anything about that.”

Watch the remarks below: 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate