Claire McCaskill, One of the Nation’s Most Vulnerable Democrats, Just Lost

Loyal Trump supporter Josh Hawley will take the Missouri senator’s seat.

Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Republican Josh Hawley won in Missouri on Tuesday evening, beating out Democratic incumbent Claire McCaskill in one of the nation’s tightest senate races.

The election represented more than the candidates’ popularity: It tested the notion that a moderate Democrat could maintain federal office in Trump country. Since McCaskill was voted into the Senate, in 2006, Missouri has turned increasingly red. President Donald Trump carried the vote by nearly 20 points in 2016, and he repeatedly returned to Missouri in recent months to campaign for Hawley. On Monday, the president wrapped up his whirlwind midterm campaigning tour in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, flanked by Fox News’ Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh.

Hawley, the state’s 38-year-old attorney general, boasts a résumé enviable to any ambitious conservative: degrees from Stanford University and Yale Law School, where he was the head of the Federalist Society; a clerkship for Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts; an appointment as an associate professor at the University of Missouri Law School. Working at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty (dubbed “God’s ACLU” by TIME magazine), he helped write the winning brief in the Hobby Lobby case, in which the Supreme Court allowed the chain store, owned by Evangelical Christians, to deny Obamacare-mandated contraceptive coverage to employees based on religious beliefs.

Hawley often mentions his allegiance to Trump, and his views—pro-life, anti-Obamacare—fall in line with conservative senators from red states. As attorney general, he signed on to a lawsuit with 19 other states that aims to dismantle the Afford­able Care Act. In recent weeks, he argued for repeal of the federal tax provision that prohibits religious organizations from endorsing politicians. 

With Hawley in office, Missouri has solidified its red-state status, and the Senate has lost one of its last remaining female moderates. McCaskill has held public office for virtually her entire career, rising in the ranks from state representative to county prosecutor to state auditor, and then to US senator in 2006. All the while, she made a name for herself as a pragmatic and tough politician, one who takes on evasive government agencies and greedy companies with equal parts vengeance and charm.

Along the campaign trail, Hawley portrayed McCaskill as a liberal elite who, he recently said, is “just like Hillary.” But as the campaign came to a close, McCaskill drew criticism for distancing herself from her Democratic colleagues in an aggressive attempt to appeal to Missouri’s Trump supporters. In a recent Fox News interview, she condemned “crazy Democrats” who confront Trump administration figures in public and talked about her history of clashing with Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. Asked about the migrant caravan in the same interview, she said, “Stop it at the border. I think the president has to use every tool he has at his disposal and I’ll 100 percent back him up on that.”

We want to hear from you. How are you reacting? Do you have a message for the winner? Let us know by filling out the form below, send us an email at talk@motherjones.com, or leave us a voicemail at (510) 519-MOJO. We may use some of your responses in a follow-up story.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate