November 7, 2018

In New Attorney General, Trump Will Be Looking for a Loyal Defender Against Democrats

From the start, he complained that Jeff Sessions was insufficiently loyal.

President Trump and then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions at the White House in March 2017 for a listening session on the opioid epidemic. Shawn Thew/CNP via ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In choosing his next attorney general, President Donald Trump is likely to put one qualification above the rest: loyalty to Trump. For nearly two years, Trump has wailed that Attorney General Jeff Sessions was not protecting him. Now, as special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe moves forward and Democrats in the House of Representatives gain the power to investigate Trump, he will likely select someone he views as a faithful protector of the president. 

Sessions, who resigned Wednesday at the president’s request, was by all accounts a loyal Trumpist: a foe of immigration, a tough-on-crime zealot, and a lax enforcer of civil rights laws. He wore MAGA hats and led “lock her up” chants. But Sessions failed to personally defend the president against the Russia investigation. Trump interpreted his decision to recuse himself from the investigation in the first month of his tenure as a sign of disloyalty and has been itching to get rid of him ever since.

The attorney general post was clearly a dream job for Sessions, a former prosecutor and longtime Alabama senator whose extreme positions on immigration and crime were sidelined in the Senate. As attorney general, he could singlehandedly effectuate policies that had fallen out of vogue with his Senate colleagues. But just weeks into his tenure, Sessions set the stage for his own ouster by recusing from the Russia investigation, after it was revealed that he had misled the Senate about his contact with Russian officials during the presidential campaign. Trump frequently expressed his frustration with Sessions’ recusal to aides and the press. On multiple occasions, he came to the brink of firing Sessions. Publicly, he attacked him repeatedly, calling him “beleaguered” and “weak.”

In December 2017, Trump bluntly laid out the kind of loyalty he expects from his attorney general. “I don’t want to get into loyalty, but I will tell you that, I will say this: [Attorney General Eric] Holder protected President Obama,” he told the New York Times. “Totally protected him. When you look at the IRS scandal, when you look at the guns for whatever, when you look at all of the tremendous real problems they had, not made-up problems like Russian collusion, these were real problems. When you look at the things that they did, and Holder protected the president. And I have great respect for that, I’ll be honest, I have great respect for that.”

This quote provides a glimpse of what Trump will expect from his next chief law enforcement officer: protection not only from the Russia probe but from Democrats in Congress. It’s a position that would further politicize the Justice Department. And the next attorney general will know that no matter how simpatico he or she is with Trump’s other priorities, a failure to protect the president will mean losing the job. 

Long before Trump’s election, it was clear that he prized loyalty above all other things in the people around him. His longtime fixer, Michael Cohen, claimed he would take a bullet for Trump. When Trump became president, he pressed his FBI director, James Comey, on multiple occasions to profess his loyalty. After Comey demurred, he was fired. 

The next attorney general’s loyalty will quickly be put to the test. Unlike Sessions, Trump’s next attorney general will take over supervision of Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. If Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker doesn’t fire Mueller or rein in the investigation, Sessions’ permanent replacement will be expected to wind it down. (Sessions’ final act of loyalty to Trump was that he chose to resign at Trump’s request, rather than be fired, so that Whitaker could take over with authority to oversee the Mueller investigation.)

The next attorney general will also be chosen as Trump faces investigations by Democrats now in control of the House of Representatives. Beginning in January, Democrats are likely to request Trump’s tax returns and launch investigations into his foreign business connections, some of his most controversial acts as president, and the actions of multiple Cabinet officials and federal agencies.

Trump’s loyalty requirement will go beyond protecting him. Trump believes the Justice Department should also be used to go on offense against his opponents. In response to the threat of these House investigations, Trump tweeted Wednesday that “we will likewise be forced to consider investigating them for all of the leaks of Classified Information.” He threatened to use the Senate to investigate Democrats, but the Justice Department would likely also become a weapon. Part of Sessions’ perceived disloyalty was his failure to launch more investigations against Hillary Clinton and other Democrats (though Sessions did push the bounds of his recusal by authorizing some additional inquiries into Clinton and others Democrats).

Trump’s Twitter feed provides ample evidence of the kind of political investigations the president expects from his attorney general. 

Trump also expects investigations that are detrimental to fellow Republicans to be swept under the rug. 

Trump came to office with the view that the Justice Department should be a political arm of the White House. Now, Trump will have the opportunity to bring it closer to his vision.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate