After Michael Cohen, More Trump-Russia Figures Could Face Charges for Lying to Congress

“We believe other witnesses were also untruthful before our committee,” says Rep. Adam Schiff.

Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to making false statements to Congress about a Moscow real estate project Trump pursued during the months he was running for president.Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Michael Cohen is the first associate of President Donald Trump charged with lying to Congress. He probably won’t be the last.

The former Trump lawyer and fixer pleaded guilty Thursday to making false statements in an August 28, 2017, letter he sent to the House and Senate intelligence committees regarding his role in helping Trump pursue plans to build a Trump tower in Moscow. Now Democratic lawmakers say they are gearing up to press for charges against other Trump allies whom lawmakers suspect of misleading Congress.

“Mr. Cohen’s plea today also highlights concern over another issue—that we believe other witnesses were also untruthful before our committee,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the incoming chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told reporters Thursday.

In separate remarks Thursday, Schiff said he believes that longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone is among the witnesses who “were untruthful” when they testified before the panel during its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. “The contacts between Roger Stone and his associates and WikiLeaks, that we are seeing more publicly about, indicate that his testimony was far from truthful before our committee,” Schiff said.  He did not detail exactly what he believes Stone lied about, though Jerome Corsi, a far-right operative and Stone associate, revealed in recent days that he expects to be charged with perjury for lying to Mueller’s team about his contacts with Stone and WikiLeaks. Corsi told the Wall Street Journal that he helped Stone concoct a “cover story” to hide the basis of a Stone tweet that appeared to indicate knowledge of the group’s plans.

Schiff said he believes other witnesses whom he declined to name also lied to the panel. In September, the committee voted to release transcripts of interviews it conducted, but the timeline for doing so is uncertain. Schiff said Thursday that the committee should “accelerate” that process. If not, he said, Democrats will release the transcripts once they take over control of the panel in January.

Schiff has previously questioned the veracity of the testimony provided by Erik Prince, former head of the Blackwater security firm and brother of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, and Carter Page, a former Trump campaign national security aide. Prince said during a November 30, 2017, committee interview that he had no formal contact with the Trump campaign other than occasionally sending policy papers on foreign policy. But the New York Times reported in May that Prince attended an August 3, 2016, Trump Tower meeting where George Nader, an adviser to the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, part of the United Arab Emirates, told Donald Trump Jr. that the UAE and Saudi Arabia hoped to help his father win the election. Prince also told the committee that a UAE-brokered meeting he attended in the Seychelles with a Russian fund manager close to Russian President Vladimir Putin was unplanned, a claim that subsequent reports appear to contradict. In his testimony to the committee last fall, Page first denied and then downplayed meetings with Russian officials during a July 2016 trip he took to Moscow. In a memo last month, Schiff said the FBI has information that contradicts Page’s claims.

Democrats also question Trump Jr.’s claim, which he made in testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, that he did not tell his father in advance about the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with a Russia lawyer who he believed would deliver damaging information from the Russian government on Hillary Clinton. Schiff has said he plans to subpoena phone records to check whether a phone call the president’s son received while he was arranging the meeting came from his father, which could help belie Trump Jr.’s claim.

Democrats have additionally questioned testimony that Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, made to multiple congressional committees. Last summer Kushner testified before the House and Senate intelligence committees that he knew of no contact between the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks during the 2016 presidential campaign. But subsequent reporting revealed that Trump Jr. had traded private Twitter messages with WikiLeaks and told Kushner about those communications. Last year, the Republican and Democratic leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee also charged that Kushner was aware of a “Russian backdoor overture and dinner invite” but failed to provide that information to the committee.

Top members of the Senate Intelligence Committee have signaled they may formally ask the Justice Department to pursue charges against witnesses that may have lied in testimony to the panel. The committee previously sent a criminal referral to the department asking that Samuel Patten, a Republican operative and lobbyist, face charges for false statements he made to the panel. As part of a deal in which he pleaded guilty to unregistered lobbying for a Ukrainian political party, Patten admitted he lied to the committee and withheld information from it about that work. Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the panel, told reporters Thursday that Cohen’s admission he lied to the committee fit a pattern. “This is one more example of one of the president’s closest allies lying about their ties to Russia and Russians,” Warner said.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate