Nevada Just Elected a Democratic Governor for the First Time Since 1994

Clark County Commissioner Steve Sisolak pulls off an upset.

Former Vice President Joe Biden rallies with Steve Sisolak after speaking at the Culinary Workers Union to kick early voting. Larry Burton/ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In a race that had been a toss-up in the polls leading up to the election, Steve Sisolak defeated Republican Adam Laxalt to become Nevada’s first Democratic governor in more than 20 years.

Sisolak, currently a member of the Clark County Commission, is the first Democrat to be elevated to the Nevada governor’s mansion since 1994. With strong support from the culinary workers’ union, Sisolak managed to bring out enough voters in urban Clark County around Las Vegas to cancel out strong Republican turnout in rural areas in Washoe County around Reno.

His opponent comes from a storied Nevada political family. Currently the Nevada attorney general, Laxalt is the grandson of former Nevada governor and US senator Paul Laxalt and the illegitimate son of the late Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.).

Laxalt’s first job in politics was working for John Bolton, then an undersecretary of state for President George W. Bush. Bolton now works for President Donald Trump, who endorsed Laxalt over the summer. Laxalt campaigned to the right of incumbent Republican governor Brian Sandoval, with whom he has disagreed on a number of issues while serving as attorney general. Sandoval declined to endorse a candidate in the race to replace him.

In October, a dozen members of Laxalt’s family wrote an op-ed in the Reno newspaper, urging voters to reject his candidacy based on his “phoniness” and his position on immigration. They accused him of lacking Nevada roots and a real understanding for the state, which he moved to only about a year before running for attorney general. (Laxalt grew up in the DC area and went to Georgetown University.)

Laxalt has also steadfastly aligned himself with the National Rifle Association, even in the wake of the Las Vegas mass shooting, which left 59 people dead last October. After the shooting, Laxalt refused to endorse any gun control measures and said he thought it was important to “slow down” on such calls. The gun control group Everytown for Gun Safety’s political spending arm responded by committing $3.5 million to help get out the vote for Sisolak, who made gun safety a part of his campaign platform.*

In March, Ryan Bundy, son of controversial rancher Cliven Bundy, entered the race as an independent. Republicans feared that Bundy, who was polling at around 4 to 6 percent before the election, would siphon enough votes from Laxalt to throw the race to Sisolak. Bundy garnered less than 2 percent of the vote, mostly in rural areas, and not enough to significantly impact the race. Republican political consultant Chuck Muth, a former executive director of the Nevada Republican Party, predicted last week that this would be the case. “He’s got name recognition and certainly has sympathy for what he went through,” he told Mother Jones. “However, when people go to the polls, they may have a sentimental attachment to a candidate, but when they look at the hard reality, a lot of those rural voters, in the privacy of the voting booth, they’re not going to vote for him.”

Correction: An earlier version of this article misidentified the origin of Everytown for Gun Safety.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate