One of Trump’s Top EPA Officials is Resigning Following His Indictment

An ethics scandal in Alabama takes down Trey Glenn.

Johannes Schmitt-Tegge/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator indicted last week on charges that he conspired to violate Alabama ethics rules has resigned.

Trey Glenn, who had been appointed by President Donald Trump, resigned in a letter to EPA administrator Andrew Wheeler over the weekend. In the letter, Glenn says he is innocent but does not want to cause a distraction. The EPA did not return multiple requests for comment on Glenn’s status last week, even as he turned himself in to local authorities and was released on $30,000 bond. 

Trump appointed Glenn to run the EPA’s Region 4, which encompasses much of the south-eastern United States, including Glenn’s home state of Alabama, in August 2017. At the time of Glenn’s appointment, a bribery scandal was tearing through the state’s political establishment, and now he has been caught up in its aftershocks.

The scandal stems from an effort by the Alabama-based Drummond Coal company to block an EPA effort, overseen by Region 4, to clean up the 35th Avenue neighborhood, a badly polluted, mostly African-American community in north Birmingham. Under the Obama administration, the EPA identified a group of companies as potentially liable for the neighborhood’s polluted state—and potentially on the hook for a costly cleanup. But a major cleanup of the site never happened, in part thanks to a massive pushback from state officials. That pushback, it turns out, was orchestrated by Drummond and attorneys from the Birmingham law firm Balch & Bingham.

Drummond’s opposition to the cleanup wasn’t secret. But in June 2017, the Department of Justice announced that an Alabama state representative had admitted to taking bribes from the company to oppose the EPA’s effort. This fall, a Drummond executive and a Balch attorney were convicted of making those bribes, and during the course of their trial it became clear how connected Drummond and Balch really were—and in particular, how close then-Sen. Jeff Sessions worked with Drummond and Balch to block the cleanup. 

When appointed to his EPA job, Glenn reported on his personal financial disclosure documents that he had worked as a consultant for Drummond in its opposition to the EPA’s cleanup efforts in 35th Avenue. Glenn testified at the bribery trial, and while on the stand he said that one of the men who was eventually convicted, David Roberson, a vice-president at Drummond, had written him a letter of reference for the EPA job. As head of the EPA’s Region 4, Glenn oversaw the EPA’s work on the 35th Avenue project, though he did recuse himself from handling anything related to Drummond or Balch. 

Last week, however, he and his business partner, Scott Phillips, were indicted by a Jefferson County grand jury on ethics charges. Details of the indictments are still vague—copies of the indictments have not been released—but a press release from the Alabama Ethics Commission said that both men were charged with numerous counts. At the time of the fight to block the EPA from cleaning up 35th Avenue, Phillips sat on the Alabama Environmental Management Commission, but was also the co-owner of a firm with Glenn. The charges against Phillips include inappropriate solicitation or receiving of money or other items of value from a lobbyist and allegations that Phillips violated rules against the “use of office for personal gain.” Glenn was indicted separately from Phillips on multiple counts of conspiracy or complicity.  

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate