Xochitl Torres Small Flips New Mexico’s Conservative 2nd District

“This is just the beginning.” 

Russell Contreras/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Xochitl Torres Small, a 33-year-old water attorney and first-time candidate, is going to Washington to represent New Mexico’s 2nd Congressional District. In a region that’s 99.6% rural, Torres Small won 50.7 percent of the vote, beating back Republican state lawmaker Yvette Herrell after nearly 36 hours of uncertainty, the Associated Press and New York Times confirmed. 

She will be the first woman to represent the district in its history and only the third Democrat in nearly 50 years. 

“It would have been easy to give up on this process,” Torres Small told the Las Cruces Sun News Wednesday night. “People could have said this is just another time where it hasn’t worked. And instead, people were calling me up this morning, people were showing up this morning, people were showing up to make sure their votes counted. And this is just the beginning.” 

Since clinching the Democratic nomination, Torres Small had closed the gap considerably in the race to replace Rep. Steve Pearce (R-N.M.), who did not seek reelection in order to mount an unsuccessful run to replace Republican Gov. Susana Martinez, who is prohibited by law from seeking a third consecutive term. Torres Small raised $3.7 million, more than three-times as much as Herrell, a four-term state representative whose unabashed support for Donald Trump put her at odds with the state’s more moderate Republican leadership.

In June, Martinez said “there are some questions with reference to [Herrell’s] ability to … represent New Mexico in a fair and reasonable way.” On her website, Herrell touted endorsements from the National Rifle Association and the far-right House Freedom Caucus. Her campaign’s two largest donations came from the Freedom Caucus’ political action committee and Yates Petroleum. In contrast, Torres Small’s biggest donors were EMILY’s List, an organization that supports female Democrats, and the University of California. Despite considerable support from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which offered resources and other support to Torres Small as a member of their “Red to Blue” list, she still trailed Herrell in every major poll up until Election Day. 

After initially claiming victory on Tuesday night, Herrell’s campaign still has not conceded. “Last night, we heard from Xochitl Torres Small that it was extremely important that every vote be counted,” a spokesperson told the Las Cruces Sun News. “This campaign believes that should be the case and we look forward to seeing the results from all provisional ballots throughout the district.”

Among the many issues that divided the candidates during the campaign, few were more stark than public lands. Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks National Monument, which was designated in 2014, is immensely popular among the residents of Las Cruces. In a Facebook post shortly before winning the Democratic primary, Torres Small vowed to “protect” the monument from reducing in size. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke put OMDP under review last year but ultimately spared it from any change in boundaries.   

With her victory, Torres Small will become the first Democrat to represent New Mexico’s 2nd District since 2008, when businessman Harry Teague was elected in the Democratic wave that accompanied Barack Obama’s ascent to the White House. Outside of Teague’s two years in office, Republicans have controlled the district for the last three decades. But the 2nd District has produced some surprises. In 1980, residents elected a write-in candidate because the Republican incumbent died shortly after the deadline for the party to nominate another candidate. As Dede Feldman, a former state lawmaker once told Mother Jones and High Country News in an interview, “I think all bets are off with that district.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate