Arizona Governor Appoints Martha McSally to Senate Seat

The losing GOP candidate will get a second chance.

Martha McSallyMatt York/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey announced on Tuesday that he is appointing Republican Rep. Martha McSally to serve as the state’s junior US senator, filling the seat that GOP Sen. Jon Kyl will vacate by the end of the year. Ducey, a Republican, had appointed Kyl earlier this year to fill the seat of the late Sen. John McCain (R).

McSally, the first female Air Force pilot to fly in combat, has in recent years become a rising star within the Republican Party and is a strong ally of President Donald Trumpā€™s. She narrowly lost to Democrat Kyrsten Sinema in last monthā€™s Senate election to succeed the retiring Jeff Flake (R) but will now get to revive her political career by serving in the chamber for at least two years. She will face a special election in 2020, the winner of which will face reelection two years later. Sinema and McSally will become the stateā€™s first female senators, and Arizona will be one of only a handful of states to have ever had two women serving concurrently in the Senate.

The governor’s actions have not been without controversy. In November, Arizona voters filed a federal lawsuit against Ducey claiming he violated the 17th Amendment to the US Constitution when he appointed Kyl to fill McCain’s seat in September.

In deciding who to appoint to replace Kyl, Ducey was likely thinking about the long term, specifically looking for a Republican who could win in 2020 and again in 2022, at the conclusion of what would have been McCainā€™s six-year term. McSally already has strong name recognition and $1 million in campaign funds left over from her Senate run this year.

In a statement about his selection to the Arizona Republic, Ducey cited McSally’s military background and multiple deployments to the Middle East.

“All her life, Martha has put service firstā€”leading in the toughest of fights and at the toughest of times,ā€ the governor’s statement said. “With her experience and long record of service, Martha is uniquely qualified to step up and fight for Arizonaā€™s interests in the US Senate.ā€

In accepting her new role, McSally said in a statement to the Republic that having traveled all over the state during her unsuccessful 2018 campaign, she understands the challenges Arizonans face. “I am humbled and grateful to have this opportunity to serve and be a voice for all Arizonans,” she said. “I look forward to working with Senator-elect Kyrsten Sinema and getting to work from day one.”

Duceyā€™s pick could upset a number of voters in Arizona, from liberals and independents who didnā€™t vote for McSally in November, to some longtime McCain supporters who were offended by her rebuff of McCain during her 2018 Senate race. McSally failed to mention McCain’s name last August during Trump’s signing of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 2019. Some in the McCain camp were frustrated by her decision to align herself closely with the president during the campaign.

However McSally took steps in the past month to assuage key Republicans who were concerned about her. She met privately with Ducey in recent weeks and separately with McCainā€™s widow, Cincy McCain. McSally also had backing from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who lobbied Ducey to appoint to her the Senate.

Especially after Sinema’s historic victory last month, Democrats are likely to aggressively contest McSally in the 2020 special election. Those mentioned as potential candidates include Rep. Ruben Gallego; former Arizona Attorney General Grant Woods (who recently switched to being a Democrat); Mark Kelly, an astronaut and the husband of former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords; and Greg Stanton, the former mayor of Phoenix who won Sinemaā€™s congressional seat in November.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate