Facebook Let These Misleading Advertisers Promote the Border Wall Fundraiser

Advertisers are supposed to disclose who paid for political messages.

Dominic Lipinski/PA Wire/ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Facebook users are running sponsored political advertisements promoting the crowdfunding campaign for President Donald Trump’s border wall under misleading “Paid for by” labels. Earlier this year, Facebook similarly came under fire for the “Paid for by” labels on its political ads.

According to Facebook’s own policies, advertisers running political ads or those that have national importance are required to disclose who paid for the ad with a “Paid for by” label. To run a disclosure on Facebook, a user must submit their name to the company for approval, as well as an image of a valid driver’s license or US passport and the last four digits of their Social Security number. 

The requirement is intended to increase transparency of political advertisements and make it harder for governments to try to sway political elections in other countries through paid political advertising on Facebook.

But some users seem to have found a way around that. One page, posing as Trump but which does not appear to be officially affiliated with the president or White House, on Friday morning ran an ad linking to the GoFundMe campaign for the border wall. The “Paid for by” label on the ad was listed as “a private citizen and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.” The Facebook page offered no details into that private citizen. 

By Friday afternoon, the page appeared to have been deleted after being on the site for around 24 hours. The page had accrued 1,431 followers before it was finally removed.

Another ad, run by the page “Virginia Militia,” links to a Washington Times story about the crowdfunding efforts for the border wall, with the “Paid for by” label listed as just “Constitutional conservative.” The Virginia Militia page previously linked directly to the border wall campaign in a sponsored post, but the post was taken down for violating Facebook’s advertising policies. The Virginia Militia page offers no further details on the constitutional conservative in question.

Both of the ads with the fake labels were first spotted by Natalie Martinez at Media Matters.

The effort to crowdfund for Trump’s border wall was started earlier this week by Florida resident Brian Kolfage after congressional efforts to pass border wall appropriations had stalled. On the GoFundMe page, Kolfage, an Iraq War veteran, urges supporters to check into his background to determine that he is a “credible and a real person,” but makes no mention of the fact, discovered by NBC News, that he created the Right Wing News Facebook page as well as a network of affiliate sites that peddled conspiracy theories. Facebook pulled down Kolfage’s page in October during a purge of over 500 pages it said were created by fake accounts that often pushed misleading news.

Facebook first instituted the “Paid for by” labels in an attempt to make political ads more transparent after revelations that the Kremlin, with its Internet Research Agency, attempted to influence the 2016 presidential election by manipulating social-media platforms, including Facebook.

But lawmakers and experts sharply criticized Facebook after Vice News published two stories about how Facebook’s paid-for labeling could be easily gamed. The publication bought fakes ads and labeled them as being paid for by ISIS, Mike Pence, and all 100 US senators, all of which Facebook approved. 

“It’s clear that voluntary standards aren’t leading to real transparency and disclosure,” Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia said in a statement to Mother Jones in reaction to the misleading “Paid for by” labels. “This is why we need the Honest Ads Act,” he continued, referring to legislation he created with Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. Their bill would hold internet companies, including Facebook, to the same set of strict standards for political advertising as other mediums like TV, radio, and print news.

Tonya Riley contributed to this article.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate