A New Report Shows That Facebook and Instagram Posts From Russian Intelligence Doubled After Trump Won

Content was designed to prey on racial tensions in the United States.

Omar Marques/SOPA Images/ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A new report released Monday reveals that the Internet Research Agency, the troll farm linked to Russian intelligence, actually increased its social media activity after the 2016 election.

The report, which took seven months to complete and is the most comprehensive of its kind to date, comes from researchers at Oxford University and analytics firm Graphika. Their data shows the volume of IRA activity doubling between 2016 and 2017 on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, even as the number of ads purchased by the agency decreased. The amount of activity increased the most on Facebook-owned Instagram, where it more than doubled from 2,611 posts in 2016 to 5,956 posts in 2017.

The research is based on Facebook data from 2015-2017, Twitter data from 2009-2018, and YouTube data from 2014-2018 that was provided by the companies to the Senate Intelligence Committee and relayed to the researchers.

According to the researchers, the IRA’s most effective Facebook content came from organic, not purchased, posts. The top organic posts came from a spectrum of IRA-created pages, including ones targeting conservatives (such as “Being Patriotic,” “Stop A.I. All Invaders,” and “Heart of Texas”), as well as pages geared toward minority users (like “Blacktivist,” “United Muslims of America,” and “Brown Power”). Post-election ad volume peaked on Facebook during April 2017 and focused on news events including the US missile strikes against Syria and bombing in Afghanistan and the Republican tax plan.

The report finds that most of the engagement for IRA content pulled around just a few highly viral top posts. Of the 81 pages flagged by Facebook, the top 20 received 99 percent of the engagements, shares, and likes. Just 20 Facebook ad campaigns constituted the bulk of IRA spending. Instagram, which had more than double the amount of IRA-backed content as Facebook, saw a similar breakdown: 40 pages received 99 percent of the 185 million “likes” received by IRA content.

The report also confirms previously reported trends that the IRA disproportionately targeted communities of color on the left and, from the very same computers, “extreme conservatives” with content that preyed on anti-immigration and racist views on the right. While the authors find that conservative-geared content pushed voters toward the GOP and President Donald Trump, content targeted at black Americans “sought to divert their political energy away from established political institutions by preying on anger with structural inequalities…including police violence, poverty, and disproportionate levels of incarceration.” The IRA also targeted voters based on location: African Americans in Ferguson, Baltimore, and Oakland were all targeted for posts related to black activism. Cities in Texas were targeted for campaigns focusing on pro-gun politics.

A second report also based on data from the Senate Intelligence Committee was released Monday, from cyber security researchers at New Knowledge, which includes findings that the Kremlin influence campaign amplified conservative media outlets to foment division in the United States.

The Oxford and Graphika study also examined purchased advertising on Google, but limited data made available to researchers make the IRA’s strategy to harness the search giant less clear. “The data shared by Google with the SSCI suggests the IRA’s ads sought to redirect traffic towards 38 different websites and URLs, leveraging a mix of text, display, and video formats. Without additional context, these 38 different links do not tell a clear story, and point to disparate effort,” the study reports. Of the links that were provided, five redirected to YouTube videos; other ads targeted Canadian users and residents of a small town in Georgia.

The influence campaign involved other tech platforms including Medium, PayPal, Reddit, Tumblr, and Pinterest; IRA posts on more prominent social-media platforms linked to the sites.

Since 2016, Facebook has cracked down on politically motivated content spammers and foreign influence campaigns and has made efforts to regulate its political advertising platform, as the racial bias of its advertising tools have come under intense scrutiny from activists and lawmakers.

“This newly released data demonstrates how aggressively Russia sought to divide Americans by race, religion and ideology, and how the IRA actively worked to erode trust in our democratic institutions,” Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Richard Burr (R-N.C.) wrote in a statement Monday hailing the research. “Most troublingly, it shows that these activities have not stopped.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate