Ryan Zinke Out as Interior Secretary

Trump announced the departure of the scandal-plagued cabinet official.

George Frey/Getty Images

President Donald Trump announced Saturday morning that Ryan Zinke—who, as Interior secretary, oversees nearly one-fifth of all land in the United States—will leave his post at the end of the year. Trump said he will nominate a new secretary in the next week, though Zinke will likely be replaced in an acting capacity by David Bernhardt, the current deputy secretary.

During his 22-month tenure as head of the department, Zinke adopted a cozy relationship with oil and gas interests that unnerved swaths of the agency’s more than 70,000 federal employees and helped spark at least a dozen federal investigations into his conduct. Like former Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt, Zinke displayed an abiding personal loyalty to Trump coupled with a distrust of the department’s career staffers. Last September, he told members of a trade group stocked with oil industry executives that 30 percent of his “crew” were not “loyal to the flag.”

Zinke, who spent 23 years as a Navy SEAL before turning to politics, went on to centralize power at Interior among a small group of loyal advisers—many of them with ties to industries that regularly have business before the department—and commissioned Bernhardt, a longtime oil lobbyist, to run day-to-day operations. Under his watch, the department rolled back regulations aimed at limiting methane pollution and weakened the landmark Endangered Species Act. Zinke, who once called himself an “unabashedly Teddy Roosevelt Republican,” displayed an affinity for conservation earlier in his political career but careened sharply toward befriending the type of industry leaders who have regularly challenged Interior’s stewardship mission.

In July, the department’s inspector general opened an investigation into whether a land deal involving Zinke’s foundation and the chairman of oil services giant Halliburton constituted a conflict of interest. The project would have been near land owned by Zinke’s family foundation in his hometown of Whitefish, Montana, and produced a “potential financial benefit” for Zinke and his wife by increasing the value of their land, CNN reported. Last month, the IG’s office referred an unspecified inquiry to the Justice Department for a possible criminal investigation. It was not immediately clear if the DOJ was looking into the land deal or one of Zinke’s other much-scrutinized moves, such as letting his wife use government vehicles without a clear justification. Zinke denied wrongdoing in both cases, but the Washington Post reported earlier this month that Trump had become increasingly concerned about the allegations against his Interior secretary.

In a statement Saturday afternoon, Zinke said he stepped down because he could not “justify spending thousands of dollars defending myself and my family against false allegations.”

Upon taking over at Interior, Zinke sidelined career employees with experience working on Obama-era priorities like climate change and wildlife conservation in favor of political appointees with close ties to Zinke, experience in former Republican administrations, or ties to the oil and gas industry. Indur Goklany, a longtime department staffer who once argued that rising levels of carbon dioxide emissions could be a “good thing,” became an influential voice for aligning Interior’s climate change work with the skeptical stance taken by the Trump White House. In one unprecedented decision, Zinke ordered that all federal grants exceeding $50,000 be routed through an office run by a former high school football teammate. The review dramatically slowed down more than $5.5 billion in funding to typical recipients like the Climate Adaptation Science Centers.

Zinke’s well-known love of hunting also drew ire from conservationists. Despite not convening a single meeting with the National Park Service advisory board, Zinke established an “International Wildlife Conservation Council” and stocked it with hunters, gun industry types, and a reality TV host. He successfully urged Trump—himself no fan of hunters—to repeal President Barack Obama’s ban on importing elephant trophies from two African countries and eased rules on extreme hunting practices in Alaska that critics have called inhumane.

Zinke is the latest high-profile departure to rattle a presidential administration that has already cycled through four national security advisers and five communication directors. Two months ago, Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley announced her departure, sparking some rumors that Zinke might be nominated as her replacement. That didn’t happen, but Zinke is leaving Interior anyway. In his absence, the department is expected to undergo a transition familiar to employees of the EPA: a high-flying director turning over the reins to an under-the-radar, ex-lobbyist deputy with much more knowledge of the department. As Rebecca Leber explained in her recent profile of Bernhardt:

Bernhardt is the perfect No. 2 to a highly visible No. 1. Zinke is the folksy charmer; Bernhardt is the strictly-business lawyer. Zinke is the relative outsider, an opportunist, and a politician; Interior watchdogs say Bernhardt is the ultimate DC swamp creature. Zinke is relatively new to Interior; Bernhardt, who spent eight years at the department earlier in his career, knows the ins and outs of its labyrinthine bureaucracy. And while Zinke has been mired in scandals and faces at least six active ethics investigations—including inspector general inquiries into possible Hatch Act lobbying violations and a Halliburton land deal in his hometown of Whitefish, Montana—Bernhardt has been largely invisible. Much like Andrew Wheeler, the technocrat who succeeded Scott Pruitt after his rocky stint atop the Environmental Protection Agency, Bernhardt could seamlessly take command should Zinke succumb to ethics challenges or, as some speculate, exit to run to be Montana’s governor in 2020.

Bernhardt’s understanding of the department’s workings and the allies he’s installed in key political posts enable him to steer its complex network of decentralized offices while leaving few fingerprints. His calendars often have little detail in them; the environmental group Western Values Project has noted how few of his emails turn up in their frequent Freedom of Information Act requests to the Interior. “Kind of amazing that he can do anything without leaving a paper trail behind him,” said Aaron Weiss, media director of Center for Western Priorities, another conservation group.

“Bernhardt knows where all the skeletons are and the strings to pull,” Obama-era career Interior official Joel Clement told me. Unlike Zinke, whose well-cultivated cowboy persona is “all hat, no cattle,” Clement says, “the real work is being done by Bernhardt.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate