The Shutdown Could Take Its Biggest Toll on the Most Vulnerable Americans

Millions of people who rely on federal housing assistance are at risk.

Public housing in New York CityRichard B. Levine/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

With the government shutdown in its third week with no end in sight, millions of Americans who rely on federal assistance for housing are in jeopardy.

President Donald Trump’s refusal to sign a spending bill that does not include funding for a wall along the southern border has caused approximately 380,000 federal employees to be furloughed—prevented from working or collecting a paycheck. Among them are the overwhelming majority of the nearly 7,500 employees of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which will not be inspecting public housing, making repairs, or assisting victims of natural disasters for the duration of the shutdown.

“The needless government shutdown has put the lowest-income residents at risk,” said Ellen Lurie Hoffman, federal policy director at the National Housing Trust, in a letter to Congress. “This threatens seniors, people with disabilities, and families who are struggling to make ends meet.”

Ninety-five percent of HUD staffers have been furloughed. The department, which is headed by retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, administers programs vital to low-income Americans. These include the Federal Housing Administration, which is the world’s largest home insurer, and programs that assist low-income renters and fund locally managed public housing agencies.

During the shutdown, HUD will not be inspecting any public housing authorities. The 47-person Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes will only have two employees on hand to answer questions. Some repairs for public housing require approval from the agency, which won’t be granted during the shutdown. “HUD staff aren’t available to approve some of the repairs,” says Diane Yentel, president of the National Low Income Housing Coalition. “This puts low-income tenants at risk.”

And if there is a natural disaster, the agency won’t be able to assist. During the recent wildfires in California, HUD made resources available to renters and homeowners. The contingency plan states that public housing agencies should call the Federal Emergency Management Authority in case of a natural disaster emergency.

“The longer the shutdown continues, the more low-income people will be hard hit,” Yentel says. Local housing agencies rely on federal funding for capital and operating costs. They have enough funds to keep operating through the end of the month, but if the shutdown stretches into February, the situation could get precarious, particularly in smaller cities and rural areas that rely even more on the federal government.

Even before local housing agencies run out of cash, the impact of the shutdown is already being felt. Federal contracts for the Project-Based Rental Assistance program, which subsidizes rent and utilities for 1.2 million low-income families, expired on January 1, and HUD couldn’t renew them because the department was mostly shut down. (According to the Washington Post, HUD staffers hadn’t realized the program was about to expire.) Last week, HUD officials sent out emails to hundreds of landlords asking them to use reserve funds to prevent affected renters from being evicted. About 1,150 contracts have expired, and more than 1,050 more will expire if the shutdown continues into February.

“If this goes into February 1, landlords will start to go berserk,” Adrianne Todman, CEO of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, told NBC News. “They, too, have bills to pay.”

Even if local housing authorities remain operational, a shuttered HUD can prevent them from moving needy families into subsidized housing. “They may not have the staff or capacity to issue new vouchers to people on the waiting list,” Yentel says. Waiting lists for public housing can be years long.

Shutdowns in the past have spurred the same fears. In 2013, the federal government shut down for 16 days over a Republican effort to defund the Affordable Care Act. On the eve of the shutdown, the District of Columbia Housing Authority warned that it had only 30 days of funding. “Imagine if we could not pay our landlord partners, over 3,000 of them to house over 13,000 DC families, or could not make repairs to our units?” Todman, who led the DC Housing Authority at the time, tweeted.

HUD’s website has a message letting visitors know the agency is closed, with links to the contingency plan and to resources for employees. Whenever the government reopens, the agency has outlined a grand plan for welcoming back its employees, which includes a video and tweet from Carson that will be “something favorable about civil service employees.”

Meanwhile, Congress and Trump are nowhere near finalizing a deal to open the government. Trump has not relented on the border wall funding, and said the government may remain closed for months or years. Democrats have pledged not to give the president a single dollar for the wall. HUD houses many of the country’s poorest and most vulnerable residents. Yentel said in a tweet on Tuesday, “It’s incredibly reckless to risk their homes as perceived leverage for a border wall.”

We want to hear from you: What do you wish you better understood about the government shutdown? What would you like us to look into? Let us know your questions in the form below, send us an email at talk@motherjones.com, or leave us a voicemail at (510) 519-MOJO.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate