Teachers in Denver Just Went on Strike to Push for Better Pay

“We would rather be teaching students in our classrooms. But when the strike starts, we will be walking for our students.”

Thousands of teachers and supporters end their rally in front of the Capitol after marching in Denver, Colorado, in April 2018.Dougal Brownlie/The Gazette/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

More than 2,000 Denver teachers went on strike Monday for the first time in 25 years following months of negotiations with the school district—including a last-ditch effort over the weekend—over wages. The walkout, which will affect more than 71,000 students in Denver, comes on the heels of last month’s Los Angeles teacher strike, which lasted six days and yielded a 6 percent pay raise, reductions in class sizes, and more support staffers in schools throughout the city. It also sets the stage for another fight looming in Oakland, where teachers have voted to authorize a strike that could start at the end of the month. 

The city’s teachers’ union wants the district to change its pay-for-performance system for how they compensate teachers, in part by reducing or eliminating incentives for teachers who work in high-poverty schools in favor of raises to teachers’ base salaries. Teachers in Denver make an average of $50,449 a year, Colorado Public Radio reported, roughly $8,000 below the national average.  

In a letter to the state’s labor agency last month, Denver Public Schools officials asked that Democratic Gov. Jared Polis step in and mediate, a move that would have staved off a walkout for 180 days. On January 28, the teachers’ union responded that the state shouldn’t intervene, noting in its petition that state officials, including Polis, couldn’t “mend a broken relationship that currently exists between the parties.” 

Last week, Polis, who has made education a top priority, announced that the state would not get involved. He remained optimistic that a deal could be reached in time but warned that the strike would disrupt students’ lives and also hamper an effort to pursue a statewide ballot initiative to raise money for schools and road repairs. “The voters of this state do not reward dysfunction and disagreement,” he told reporters. Polis met separately with the teachers’ union and district officials to urge a resolution. In November, voters shot down an effort that would have raised taxes on Colorado’s wealthiest households and corporations to bring in $1.6 billion in tax revenue for schools and full-day kindergarten.  

The threat of a work stoppage has prompted district officials to hire substitutes and enlist central office administrators to fill in for striking teachers. Denver Superintendent Susana Cordova has stated that schools would be kept open during a walkout—similar to what happened in Los Angeles—but that they would cancel early childhood courses. Denver’s school district could lose up to $400,000 a day if teachers declined to go to work. 

“No teacher wants to strike. We would rather be teaching students in our classrooms,” Henry Roman, the president of the teachers’ union, said in a statement. “But when the strike starts, we will be walking for our students. The district’s revolving door of teacher turnover must stop. DPS must improve teacher pay to keep quality, experienced teachers in Denver classrooms.” 

The threat of work stoppage isn’t unfamiliar to teachers—or families—in Colorado. In April, after the #RedforEd protests swept through West Virginia, Oklahoma, and Arizona, hundreds of teachers protested in Denver to make a similar call for better pay. Days later, thousands of the state’s teachers, who were among the lowest-paid educators in the country, staged protests at the Colorado Legislature to call on lawmakers to raise teachers’ salaries and provide more funding for the state’s schools.

The action caused Republican lawmakers to introduce legislation that would punish teachers who went on strike, prompting criticism from state Democrats who viewed the move as “anti-worker.” The effort failed. In May, after a five-day strike, teachers in Pueblo, nearly two hours south of Denver, won a 2 percent pay increase. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate