Republicans Could Block a New Election in Contested North Carolina House Race

One new GOP member of the state elections board has a long history of voter suppression.

Republican candidate Mark Harris speaks to the media during a news conference in Matthews, North Carolina. Chuck Burton/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

There’s still one empty seat in the House of Representatives because of serious accusations of election fraud. And now Republicans might block the process to call for a new election there.

North Carolina’s 9th Congressional District has been vacant since November, when Republican Mark Harris defeated Democrat Dan McCready by 905 votes, but the state board of electionsĀ refused to certifyĀ Harris after evidence emerged that a consultant hired by his campaign may have committed widespread absentee ballot fraud to help the Republican campaign.

Gov. Roy Cooper,Ā a Democrat,Ā appointed new members to the board of elections on Thursday,Ā but Republican members could block a vote to hold a new election in the 9th District. The previous election board was dissolved after a court found that the Republican-controlled Legislature hadĀ unconstitutionallyĀ stripped Cooper of the power to appoint a majority of its members.Ā Democrats now have a 3-2 majority on the new board, but it takes four votes to order a new election, giving the Republican members veto power.

Democrats have accused a consultant hired by the Harris campaign, McCrae Dowless of Bladen County, a rural area in southeastern North Carolina,Ā of illegally tampering with absentee ballots that he collected from voters. Harrisā€”who has acknowledged hiring Dowlessā€”won 61 percent of Bladen Countyā€™s mail-in ballots, even though just 19 percent of those mail-in ballots came from registered Republican voters. Dowless stands accused of not submitting absentee ballots that may have been marked for McCready, while filling out some ballots for Harris without voters’ consent. In a razor-thin election, this may have changed the outcome of the race. Dowless, a convicted felon, has also drawn scrutiny for his handling of absentee ballots in previous elections dating back to 2010. North Carolina officials asked the Justice Department in January 2018 to investigate Dowless for absentee ballot fraud alleged to have occurred in 2016.

North Carolina Republican Party Executive Director Dallas Woodhouse told the Raleigh News & ObserverĀ that the GOP members would resist calls for a new election. ā€œOur team are confident that our nominees…will come to the only reasonable conclusion, that is (the) race should be certified because Dr. Harris won more legal votes and we believe no evidence can possibly show otherwise,ā€ he said. Woodhouse hadĀ told CNN in December that his party would support a new election if the evidence of election fraud proved that Harris did not rightfully win the race. Despite hyping discredited claims of voter fraud for years, Republicans have said little about the election fraud that allegedly occurred in North Carolina.

The state board of elections has the power to call for a new election if the evidence of fraud or voter disenfranchisement is ā€œsufficient in number to change the outcome of the electionā€ or ā€œirregularities or improprieties occurred to such an extent that they taint the results of the entire election and cast doubt on its fairness.ā€

One new Republican member of the board, Ken Raymond of Winston-Salem, has a long history of supporting efforts to curb access to the ballot. In 2014, as chair of the Forsyth County Board of Elections, Raymond led the effort to close an early-voting site on the campus of Winston-Salem State University, a historically black college. Four years later, as a member of the previous state board of elections, he supported closing a voting site at North Carolina State University, which he said would benefit students over the rest of the electorate, and opposed efforts to allowĀ early voting on Sundays, when black churches traditionally hold ā€œSouls to the Pollsā€ voter mobilization drives.

ā€œFrom what Iā€™m hearing from the speaker and the general feeling that Iā€™m getting is that people are going to walk away from this, listening to this, believing black people canā€™t vote unless itā€™s on Sunday, so we have to have voting on Sunday, and I want to straighten that out: African Americans can find the polls during the week, we can,ā€ Raymond,Ā who is himself African American, said at a board meeting. A federal court found that a law passed in 2013 by North Carolinaā€™s Republican-controlled Legislature curtailing Sunday voting targeted African American voters ā€œwith almost surgical precision.ā€

The other Republican member of the board, David Black, the former chair of the elections board ofĀ Cabarrus County, outside Charlotte, has made few public statements about voting rights.

If the state board of elections deadlocks, the US House, which has already declined to seat Harris, could declare a vacancy in the 9th District, giving North Carolinaā€™s governorĀ (a Democrat) the power to schedule a new election.

The board is scheduled to hold an evidentiary hearing in February on the contested election, and it will meet next week to set a specific date for the hearing. At a court hearing last month, a lawyer for the stateĀ said ā€œit’s an open question who won this election,” suggesting that absentee ballot fraud could have put Harris over the top.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate