Democratic Presidential Hopefuls Flock to South by Southwest Festival

A little bit of Iowa in Texas.

Jack Plunkett/Invision/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Presidential hopefuls are lining up in Austin, Texas, this weekend to appear at the trendy tech gathering known as South by Southwest (SXSW). The yearly weekend festival that features new technology, music, and film premieres attracts a young and liberal crowd that candidates are hoping they can win over.

Among the candidates and those who have not yet announced who spoke on Saturday were Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Howard Schultz, the former CEO of Starbucks who has floated the possibility of entering the race as a centrist independent.

Early on Saturday morning, in an on-stage interview with NBC News’ Dylan Byers, Schultz tried to persuade voters to support his independent bid by saying his candidacy would “disrupt the system with a centrist approach.” But as was the case in January when he initially suggested that he may run, he had a hard time explaining exactly what his approach would be. For instance, Schultz agreed it would be important to raise taxes on the wealthy, but he was unable to say by how much. He acknowledged that economic inequality should be fixed but provided scant details on how that can be achieved, only characterizing progressive plans to tackle inequality as “socialism.”

A few hours later, Senator Amy Klobuchar was interviewed by Kara Swisher, the co-founder of the tech-based website Recode. She has been dogged by reports of her verbal abuse and emotional torment of staffers during her tenure as the three-term senator from Minnesota. In one strange report, Klobuchar allegedly berated one of her staff members who failed to bring her a fork to use for her salad while they were on a plane. The senator supposedly then retrieved a comb from her purse and ate her salad with it—then demanded the staffer clean it.

At the festival, the senator admitted she briefly used the comb as a fork. When asked about her treatment of staffers and whether or not the negative press has been a part of the media’s sexist portrayal of women in power, Sen. Klobuchar replied, “I’m not going to go there. Whatever it is, I just can’t waste my time analyzing it, because the stakes are too high, and I care too much.”

During her time onstage when she was interviewed by Time magazine’s Anand Giridharadas, Sen. Elizabeth Warren sought to distance herself from democratic socialism and centrism. “Bernie has to speak to what democratic socialism [is],” she said  “And the centrists have to speak to whatever they are doing. What I can speak is to is how I am doing.” She then discussed her proposal to break up big, powerful tech companies like Facebook, Google, and Amazon. “The monopolist will make fewer monopoly profits—boo hoo,” she said of those who stand to lose money from her plan.

More Democratic hopefuls are expected to speak at the festival tomorrow, including Julian Castro, Obama’s Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary, former Colorado governor John Hickenlooper, and Washington governor Jay Inslee, who is running as the nation’s first climate candidate. Even the long-shot candidates will be making an appearance. CNN will host a town hall broadcast from SXSW featuring Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), South Bend, Indiana mayor Pete Buttigieg, and former Maryland Congressman John Delaney. The former congressman from Texas’ 16th congressional district, Beto O’Rourke, received a standing ovation when he made an appearance at the screening for  “Running With Beto,” the documentary chronicling his unsuccessful bid to unseat Senator Ted Cruz. He has not yet announced his plans for 2020.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate