March 2, 2019

Former Trump Executive Claims His CFO Could Reveal More Hush-Money Payments

“Trump would do that kind of thing and Allen would be the guy that would draw up the check.”

Evan Vucci/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer, didn’t just accuse the president of crimes before the House oversight committee this week: He also dropped names of other Trump confidants and insiders who could shed light on other potentially criminal activity within the Trump Organization.

One of the figures likely to draw the most scrutiny from congressional Democrats is the Trump Organization’s chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, whom Cohen named more than 20 times in his testimony.

On Friday night, a former Trump Organization executive vice president, Barbara Res, said that she “instinctively” believes that Weisselberg knows about additional hush-money payments. In an interview with MSNBC’s Ari Melber, she described how Weisselberg handled accounting not just for the Trump Organization, but also for Trump personally—and how that role would have given him a front row seat to any hush-money payments like those made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

“Trump would do that kind of thing and Allen would be the guy that would draw up the check,” Res said.

According to Res, the most damaging knowledge that Weisselberg has would include information about insurance claims, as well as any payoffs to keep individuals quiet ahead of the 2016 election. Weisselberg has long been a central player in the president’s dealings, and he signed one of the checks Trump used to repay Cohen for payments to Daniels. 

“Do you think that there are other hush-money payments that he would know about?” Melber asked Res.

“Yes, just instinctively,” Res said. “Lots.”

“More than five?”

“Probably.”

“More than 10?” Melber pressed.

Res demurred.

Federal prosecutors granted Weisselberg immunity last year in their investigation into Cohen. Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the chair of the House oversight committee, has said that Weisselberg will “probably” be asked to testify before the committee. 

“Will he spill the beans or do a lot of ‘I don’t remember’?” Melber asked.

“I don’t think Allen would perjure himself,” Res said.

Watch the full interview here:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate