Elizabeth Warren Wants to Save Moms From Dying During Childbirth. Her Plan Is Pretty Half Baked.

For one, it doesn’t do anything to specifically support the most vulnerable women: black mothers.

Associated Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

For American women, having a baby is becoming increasingly dangerous. Between 2000 and 2014, the rate of mothers dying during childbirth increased by more than a quarter. Black moms are especially vulnerable—they’re about four times more likely to die while having a baby than white women. This week, presidential contender Sen. Elizabeth Warren floated an idea to decrease our rising national maternal mortality rate: Pay hospitals that prevent moms from dying, and take money away from those that don’t.

“I want to see the hospitals see it as their responsibility to address this problem head on and make it a first priority,” she said at the She the People Presidential Forum in Houston on Wednesday. “And the best way to do that is to use money to make it happen.”

It’s an appealingly simple idea, and versions of it have worked in the past. For example, in 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services stopped reimbursing hospitals for costs associated with avoidable problems—like falls in the hospital and infections from dirty IV lines. Over the next decade, hospitals cleaned up their acts: In 2018, the agency calculated that hospital improvements had saved 8,000 lives and $2.9 billion.

But the experts I talked to about Warren’s plan cautioned that her carrot-and-stick approach might be an overly simplistic solution to a vexingly complicated problem. On the most basic level, there isn’t enough data today to determine which maternal deaths can be prevented. Many states still don’t accurately track their maternal mortality rate, and not all hospitals code maternal deaths in a standard way, notes Jodi Abbott, a health disparities researcher at Boston University School of Medicine. This limitation would make it almost impossible to actually implement Warren’s plan fairly.

And, as Monifa Bandele, senior vice president of the maternal and family advocacy group MomsRising, points out, Warren’s proposal does nothing to specifically address the racial disparities of the issue. “Even at well-resourced hospitals, black women experience higher rates of complications, and even among well-resourced black women,” she says.

What’s more, the complications for black women often go far beyond hospitals. As I reported last year, mounting research suggests that the stress of experiencing racism in everyday life may contribute to poor outcomes both for black moms and their babies.

Bandele, who attended the She the People forum and who asked the question that prompted the senator to introduce her plan, also worries that Warren’s idea could take away resources—like doctor trainings and specialized equipment—from hospitals that need them most. “In penalizing hospitals that are doing poorly, we can make a bad situation worse,” she says.

Abbott believes that in order for Warren’s plan to work, it’d need to get states involved, to better support hospitals’ efforts to make childbirth safer. Several states have over the past several years found some success in curbing maternal mortality by forming special committees—called quality care collaboratives—that monitor and improve the quality of care and safety at hospitals. California’s QCC, for example, helped state hospitals implement standard protocols that were proven to treat the conditions—such as hemorrhaging and high blood pressure—that commonly endangered mothers during childbirth. The state cut its maternal mortality rate by 55 percent after it established its QCC in 2006.

So for a plan like Warren’s to succeed, says Abbott, states would need to figure out how to motivate hospitals to adopt these best practices. One idea: Agencies such as state medical boards and the federal Joint Commission, which accredits hospitals, could make the practices a requirement for hospitals to be licensed. “But will these initiatives change the racial differences?” she asks. “That is a major question.”

Bandele says she sees Warren’s idea as the “beginnings of a plan” rather than a fully-formed solution. She notes that the proposal could benefit by pulling from a bill that presidential hopeful Kamala Harris introduced last year in the Senate; it included strategies aimed at making childbirth safer for black women in particular, such as funding racial bias trainings for obstetricians, midwives, and labor and delivery nurses.

For now, without clear incentives in place, it of course remains to be seen whether more states will step up to support hospitals. And the slow pace of progress frustrates Abbott. “If it was 50-year-old white men dying as frequently as black moms,” she says, “hospitals would be shut down until the best practices were implemented.” 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate